1. These revisions, one by the State and the other by the complainant, are directed against an order passed on 10-4-1980, by the Sessions Judge, Srinagar. The order reads thus : -
"After the opening address, it was found that a prima facie case under S.304/504/447 R.P.C. is made out against the accused Ab. Rahim Rather. The learned P. P. in his opening address conceded that it was not a case under S.302 R.P.C. but prima facie, a case under S.304 R.P.C. was made out against this accused. As against the accused Abdul Ahad Khan a prima facie case under S.504 R.P.C. was made out. The accused Abdul Rahim Rather was, therefore, charged under S.304/504/447 R.P.C. and the accused Abdul Ahad Khan was charged under S.504 R.P.C. The contents of the charges were read out to the accused persons. They pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. So the P. P. should produce evidence in the case now. Put up the case on 28, 29 and 30th April, 1980, respectively.
Sd/- Judge."

2. For the accused a preliminary objection was taken in regard to the maintainability of these revisions on the ground that no revision is competent against an interlocutory order. The argument of the learned counsel for the accus