Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
, J
Mohammad Shaffi and Others v. State of J. and K.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on circumstances surrounding the crime. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. witness corroboration regarding events preceding the altercation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's conclusion on evidence quality and outcome. (Para 6 , 7 , 14 , 19) |
| 4. defense claims and assertion of lawful possession. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. importance of explaining injuries sustained by accused. (Para 11 , 12 , 18) |
1. Appellants have challenged their conviction and sentence recorded in the impugned judgment and order dated 28-7-1995, passed in File No. 59 / Session by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jammu, whereby appellants Mohd. Shaffi and Mir Hussain have been convicted under S.302, S.325, S.148, S.323 read with S. 34, RPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 each under S. 302, RPC and further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under S. 325, RPC; three months under S. 148 RPC; and three months u/S. 323, RPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 each on each count. Appellants Sadiq Gani, Mir Hussain (S/o Haji Sain) and Nikka have been convicted under S.447, S.323, S.325 and S.148, RPC and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 on each
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
