Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
V. K. Jhanji, ACJ
Munshi Ram v. State of J. and K. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reviving the writ petition is justified. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. violation of approved construction plans is evident. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. ongoing litigation raises concerns about judicial conduct. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. judicial integrity is paramount. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. misconduct must be investigated. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. vigilance investigation warranted. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. restoration of status-quo-ante is essential. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. the court can review tribunal decisions. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 9. political and public interests must prevails. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. judicial review is not barred. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. high court's powers over tribunals are vast. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 12. judicial accountability must be maintained. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 13. decisions must reflect fairness and legality. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
1. This writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn in terms of order dated May 1, 1997 passed in CMP (1A-II/97). However, lately, it was revived and taken on board for disposal on merits and, in terms of order dated 15th December, 2003, notices were issued to all concerned, including the petitioner, Jammu Development Authority, though not figuring in th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
