Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
TASHI RABSTAN, J
Nazir Ahmad Dalal and Others v. Union of India and Others
Headnote: Read headnote
1. This writ petition came up for consideration on 6th April 2016. During course of argument, its maintainability was a starting - point preliminary objection fervently taken by learned counsel for respondents. Having taken preliminary objection as regards maintainability of writ petition and on consensus of learned counsel for parties, the writ petition was heard and reserved for orders.
2. Instant Writ Petition has been filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India and S.103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir . Petitioners seek issuance of writ of certiorari to quash order dated 28th May 2014 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar, (for brevity 'Trial Magistrate'), besides other reliefs. It would be advantageous to reproduce the relief sought by petitioners in writ petition;
a) Issue a writ of certiorari [or] any other appropriate writ to the Hon'ble CBI Court Sri
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision, affirming the distinct nature of Article 227.
Judicial orders in criminal cases are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, requiring challenges to follow remedies under Article 227, as clarified by statutory provisions.
The court emphasized the necessity of providing a hearing before passing orders affecting parties' rights, reinforcing the supervisory nature of Article 227 over judicial decisions.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision, with Article 227 providing distinct jurisdiction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article