Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
TASHI RABSTAN, J
Mohd. Haneefa Jan and Others v. State of J. & K. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. election process and majority definitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. disputing notification and legality of council's actions. (Para 4 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. court’s directive for floor test. (Para 5 , 13) |
| 4. interpretation of rules concerning chairmanship and elections. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion of judgment leading to implementation. (Para 14) |
1. Quashment of SRO 228 of 2016 dated 05.07.2016 issued by respondent No.1 is sought by petitioners. It (SRO 228 of 2016) provides holding of election of Chairman, LAHDC, Kargil on 18th July, 2016. Petitioners exhort vouchsafe of direction to respondents to hold Floor Test for the post of Chairman / Chief Executive Councillor of Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Kargil. They also seek a direction in the name of respondent No.3 restrained him from ceasing or interfering in the powers of Chairman, Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council on the edifice of case set up in writ petition.
2. The succinct factual background tailored in writ petition is that election for constitution of Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Kargil (hereinafter referred to as 'LAHDC') was conducted in the year 2013 and the total number o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
