Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Not mentioned, J
Madan Lal and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Jeet Singh and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of land ownership dispute and procedural history. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's grounds for challenging decisions lack basis. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. judicial review must be exercised with restraint under article 227. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. the high court is not a court of first appeal. (Para 13) |
| 5. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 18) |
1. The petitioner through the medium of the present petition which has been preferred under Art.227 of the Constitution of India is seeking quashment of the order dated 06.06.1998 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Rajouri and also the order dated 06.09.2023 passed by the learned Financial Commissioner, Jammu in revision titled Madan Lal and Ors. v. Jeet Singh and Others, whereby, the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.
2. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:
Before adverting to the grounds of challenge, it would be advantageous to give a brief history of the case which has been projected by the petitioner in the instant writ petition.
In Kharief 2007, Svt. BK and prior to that also, the father of the petitioner (Late Sh. Chandi Ram) was in cultivating possession over the land measuring 28 kanals falling
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
