SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1393

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sanjay Dhar, J
Director (Transport) Era J And K v. Sohrab Iqbal Goni


Table of Content
1. application for transfer to appropriate court. (Para 1 , 2)
2. filing sequence determines court jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5)
3. first application exclusively holds jurisdiction. (Para 6)
4. petition transferred to commercial court for adjudication. (Para 7 , 8)

This is an application filed on behalf of the respondent seeking transfer of the afore titled Arbitration Petition to the Commercial Court (Additional District Judge Bank Cases), Srinagar for disposal.

2. In the application it has been submitted that the present petition under S.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , challenging award dated 21.01.2022, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal, has been filed by the petitioner / non - applicant before this Court on 25.04.2022, whereas the applicant / respondent has challenged the same award by way of another petition under S.34 of the before the Commercial Court (Additional District Judge Bank Cases), Srinagar on 16.04.2022. It has been submitted that in terms of provisions contained in S.42 of the , all subsequent applications arising out of Arbitral Award or Arbitration Agreement, have to be filed before the same Court where the initial application with regar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top