SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1409

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
Sanjay Dhar, J
Nava Healthcare Pvt. Ltd v. Ut of J and K


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: [Name]
For the Respondents: [Name]

Table of Content
1. challenge to the trial court's jurisdiction and procedure. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the complaint and drug inspection process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. concerns regarding prosecutorial procedure and accountability. (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
4. importance of compliance with procedural requirements. (Para 12 , 14 , 18)
5. court's decision regarding the trial court's process validity. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

1. Through the medium of present judgment, the afore - titled two petitions arising out of the same complaint filed by the respondent against the petitioners and co - accused before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anantnag, are proposed to be disposed of.

2. The petitioners, who happen to be the accused in the impugned complaint, have challenged the complaint filed by the respondent against them before the trial Magistrate. By virtue of the impugned complaint, prosecution for offences under S.18(a)(1) read with S.27(d), S.18A read with S.28 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act has been launched against the petitioners and the co - accused. Challenge has also been thrown by the petitioners to the order passed by the learned trial Magistrate whereby cognizance of offences has be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top