HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MADAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE TH.V.O.J. – Respondent
S. No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Reserved on: 16.10.2025 Pronounced on:30.12.2025 Uploaded on: 30 .12.2025 Whether the operative part or
Full judgment is pronounced? Full
Madan Lal,
Aged 56 years
Son of Bodh Raj
Resident of Gorkha Nagar, Jammu
…Appellant
Through: Mr. P. N. Raina, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. J. A. Hamal, Advocate.
v.
The State of J&K through the Incharge,
Vigilance Organization, Jammu. ....Respondent
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with
Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate
CORAM:
HON‟BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
JUDGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
1. This appeal has been directed against judgment dated 24.05.2014, passed by learned Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Jammu, [“the trial
court”], vide which, appellant came to be convicted and sentenced.
2. Before a closer look at the grounds urged in the memo of appeal, it
shall be apt to have an overview of the background facts.
PROSECUTION CASE
3. As the prosecution story would unfurl, on 22.02.2006 one Gurjeet Singh [“the complainant”] lodged a written complaint with Police Station, Vigilance Organization, Jammu stating inter alia that he intended to purchase 11 marlas of land from one Balwant Kour. Sale con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.