HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
BHARAT OIL TRADERS TH MANAV MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST SAMBA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
WP(C) 192 / 2023
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 192/2023
Reserved on : 09.07.2025
Pronounced on : 30.12.2025
Uploaded on : 02.01.2026
Whether the operative part or full
judgment is pronounced : Full
Bharat Oil Traders
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate
V/s
Assistant Commissioner & anr.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Rohan Nanda, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AJEEM, JUDGE
JUDGMENT
Per : Sindhu Sharma-J
1. The petitioner submits that it is a partnership firm engaged in the
business of refilling and sale of edible oil and ghee, and is duly registered
under the State and Central Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017. The
petitioner‟s business operations involve a situation where the rate of tax
applicable on inputs is higher than the rate applicable on outward
supplies, resulting in an “Inverted Tax Structure.” Consequently, under
Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, the petitioner is entitled
to claim a refund of the accumulated input tax credit.
WP(C) No. 192 of 2023 Page 1 of 12
##PAGE2##2. Section 54 of the CGST Act provides that any person claiming a
refund of tax may make an application before the expiry of two years
from the “relevant date.” For the purpose of refund of unutilized input tax
credit under the inverted duty structure, the term “relevant date” is defined
in Explanation (2)(e) to Section 54.
3. Up to 31.01.2019, the term “relevant date” was defined to mean
“the end of the financial year in which such claim for refund arises.”
However, by virtue of the Amendment Act No. 31 of 2018, which came
into force with effect from 01.02.2019, the definition of “relevant date”
was substituted to mean “the due date for furnishing the return under
Section 39 for the period in which the claim for refund arises.”
4. The petitioner submits that the amended provision of Section 54(1),
which came into effect from 01.02.2019, operates prospectively and not
retrospectively, unless its retrospective application is beneficial to the
assessee. Therefore, for periods where the right to claim refund had
already accrued prior to the amendment, the un-amended definition of
“relevant date” would continue to apply.
5. It has been submitted that in the present case, the refund claims
under Section 54(3)(ii) pertain to the periods 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2019,
corresponding to Financial Years 2017–18 and 2018–19 respectively.
Accordingly, under the un-amended provisions of Section 54(1), the last
date for filing the refund claim for the period July 2017 to March 2018
was 31.03.2020, i.e., two years from the end of the relevant financial year.
Subsequent to the amendment, for the period from February 2018
WP(C) No. 192 of 2023 Page 2 of 12
##PAGE3##onwards, the refund application could be made before the expiry of two
years from the due date for furnishing the return under Section 39. Thus,
the application for refund for February 2018 could be filed up to March
2020, for March 2018 up to April 2020, and so on.
6. The petitioner filed its refund application on 02.02.2021. It is
submitted that, in view of Notification No. 13/2022 dated 05.07.2022 read
with the suo motu orders of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court excluding the
period from 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 from the computation of limitation
owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, the refund claim filed on 02.02.2021
is well within the prescribed limitation period.
7. The contention of the petitioner is that for the period July 2017 to
January 2018, the refund application could have been filed up to March
2020 (i.e., two years from the end of the financial year) under the pre-
amended law. For the period February 2018 onwards, the refund
application could be made up to March 2020 and thereafter, in terms of
the amended provisions prescribing a two-year limitation from the due
date of furnishing the return under Section 39. Since the limitation period
for both the above periods i.e., July 2017 to January 2018 and February
2018 to March 2019 expired in March 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.