SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1583

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
BHARAT OIL TRADERS TH MANAV MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST SAMBA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP(C) No. 192/2023 Reserved on : 09.07.2025

Pronounced on : 30.12.2025

Uploaded on : 02.01.2026

Whether the operative part or full

judgment is pronounced : Full

Bharat Oil Traders

…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)

Through:- Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate

V/s

Assistant Commissioner & anr.

…..Respondent(s)

Through:- Mr. Rohan Nanda, Advocate

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AJEEM, JUDGE

JUDGMENT

Per : Sindhu Sharma-J

1. The petitioner submits that it is a partnership firm engaged in the business of refilling and sale of edible oil and ghee, and is duly registered under the State and Central Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017. The petitioner‟s business operations involve a situation where the rate of tax applicable on inputs is higher than the rate applicable on outward supplies, resulting in an “Inverted Tax Structure.” Consequently, under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, the petitioner is entitled

to claim a refund of the accumulated input tax credit.

2. Section 54 of the CGST Act provides that any person claiming a refund of tax may make an application before the expiry of two years from the “releva

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top