SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1601

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sanjeev Kumar, Sanjay Parihar, JJ
NAZIR AHMAD BHAT – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN / MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ORS. (JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED) – Respondent
WP(C) 654 / 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Tariq M. Shah, Zahid Ahmad
For the Respondents: Insha Rashid, Taniya

Post-2016 amendment, the borrower's right of redemption under Section 13(8) SARFAESI Act is extinguished on the date of publication of auction notice, calculated as 30 days from the later of service to borrower or public notice.

Headnote:(A) Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 13(8) (as amended by Act 44 of 2016) - Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - Rule 8(1), Rule 8(5), Rule 8(6), Rule 9(1) - Right of redemption of borrower - Extinguishment on date of publication of notice for public auction - Interpretation of 'date of publication' - Distinction between pre-amendment and post-amendment position - Mathew Varghese vs M. Amritha Kumar (2014) distinguished - M. Rajendran & Ors. vs KPK Oils and Proteins Private Limited (2025) applied.

(B) The right of redemption under Section 13(8) as amended stands extinguished on the date of publication of the notice for public auction, i.e., the expiry of 30 days from the date of issuance of notice of sale (publication or service to borrower, whichever is later). The term 'publication' includes all modes: service to borrower, newspaper publication, affixation, and uploading on website as required under the Rules. The 30-day gap under Rule 9(1) is not separate but part of the composite notice of sale.

(C) The judgment in Mathew Varghese (pre-amendment) is no longer applicable post-2016 amendment as the right of redemption is now curtailed. If the first auction fails, subsequent sale notices require only 15 days' notice under Rule 8(6) proviso and Rule 9(1) proviso.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner availed credit facilities from the respondent bank and defaulted. Loan was declared NPA on 31.03.2019. Section 13(2) notice was issued on 27.06.2019. Possession notice under Section 13(4) was issued on 13.04.2023. E-auction notices were issued on 06.06.2023 (giving 15 days), then 28.07.2023 (15 days), followed by an addendum on 22.08.2023 extending bid deadline to 11.09.2023 and auction to 13.09.2023. The petitioner had from 28.07.2023 to 13.09.2023 (over 30 days) to clear dues. Sale certificate was issued to the auction purchaser on 15.12.2023. The petitioner challenged the entire process arguing lack of 30-day notice under Rule 9(1).

Findings of Court:
The court held that the petitioner had more than 30 days from the first auction notice (06.06.2023) to the actual auction (13.09.2023) - over three months. Even if the first notice gave only 15 days, the subsequent notice and addendum provided sufficient time. The legal position under M. Rajendran clarifies that the right of redemption extinguishes after 30 days from the later of publication or service. Here, the bank complied. No merit; petition dismissed.

Issues: Whether the auction sale was vitiated for non-compliance with the 30-day period under Rule 9(1) read with Section 13(8); and whether the right of redemption survived after publication of auction notice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied M. Rajendran to hold that the borrower's right of redemption is extinguished on the date of publication of the notice for public auction, which is 30 days after the later of service to borrower or public notice. Since the petitioner had more than 30 days to pay, no violation.

Result: Petition dismissed. (Paras 13-23)

J U D G M E N T

Per Sanjeev Kumar, J

1. The petitioner is a borrower in default of the J&K Bank and is aggrieved by the proceedings initiated for recovery of loan amount in terms of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [“SARFAESI Act”], in particular, notice dated 13th April 2023 issued by the Authorised Officer of the Respondent Bank under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act 2002, read with Rule 8(1) of the Security (Enforcement) Interest Rules, 2002 [“Rules of 2002”], auction notice dated 22nd August 2023, confirmation of auction vide communication dated 14th September 2023 and a Sale Certificate dated 15th December 2023 issued by Respondent-Bank in favour of Respondent No. 10, the auction purchaser. There is also a challenge laid by the petitioner to a criminal complaint dated 9th October 2023 made against the petitioner to the police.

2. Before we advert to the grounds of challenge urged by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to state few facts as are germane to the disposal of this petition.

3. The petitioner initially approached Respondent Bank and availed Cash Credit Facility of Rs. 1,10,00,000 (Rs. One Crore and ten lacs only). Later, on the request of the petitioner, the aforementioned credit facility was enhanced to Rupees 1,45,00,000 (Rs. One Crore and forty-five lacs only). The aforesaid credit facilities were granted to the petitioner by Respondent Bank inter alia against following securities:

Nature of SecurityDescription
PrimaryHypothecation of fruit and fruit crops and book debts and receivables.
Collateral1. Land measuring 10 Kanals falling under survey no 53 min(05 Kanals), Khata No 56, Khewat No 13 and Survey No 456/5(05 Kanals), Khata No 1L6, Khewat No 25 situated at Nully Poshwari

2. Land measuring 01 Kanal 03 ‰ marlas falling under survey No. 176(11 Marlas), 320 (12 ‰ Marlas) Khata No

4. It seems that after some time, the loan account became irregular on account of failure of the petitioner to repay the credit interest on time. Despite repeated requests and reminders by the bank, the petitioner failed to get his loan account regularised. The petitioner also failed to make payment of outstanding amount under the Loan Account despite having received several demands from the bank. The petitioner neither got his loan account regularised by making the requisite payment nor did he square his debt. This constrained the Respondent Bank to declare the loan account of the petitioner as Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 31st of March 2019. The petitioner was called upon to pay outstanding amount, which he failed to pay. Faced with failure of the petitioner to clear its outstanding amount and liability towards the bank, proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 were set in motion by the Respondent Bank. Composite Demand Notice dated 27th of June 2019 under Section 13 (2) of SARFAESI 2002 was served upon the petitioner requesting him to discharge his liability in full within 60 days from the date of notice. Despite having received the demand notice dated 27th of June 2019, the petitioner did not bother to come forward and clear his outstanding dues.

5. The process of recovery was taken further. The Respondent Bank issued Possession Notice dated 13th of April 2023 in terms of Rule 8(1) and (2) and Appendix IV of the Rules of 2002 with respect to the property which was mortgaged by the petitioner by way of collateral security. After taking over the possession, Respondent Bank issued e-Auction/Sale Notice dated 6th June 2023 putting the mortgaged properties to auction. In terms of the e- tender notice dated 6th of June 2023, a simultaneous notice in terms of Rule 9 (1) of the Rules of 2002 was also given to the petitioner to pay the dues of the bank outstanding against him in his loan account together with interest, charges, expenses etc. within 15 days from this notice. The bid was stated to be opened on 20th June 2023 at 3:00 PM. It se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top