IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP (C) No. 654/2024
Reserved on: 17.12.2025
Pronounced on: 30.12.2025 Uploaded on: 30.12.2025
Nazir Ahmad Bhat, Aged 47 Years.
S/o Late Ghulam Rasool Bhat R/o Nully Poshwari Tehsil Barbugh …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Imam Sahib, District Shopian Through: Mr. Tariq M. Shah, Adv. with Mr. Zahid Ahmad, Adv.
Vs.
1. Chairman/ Managing Director J&K Bank Corporate Office,
Maulana Azad Road, Dalgate, Srinagar.
2. Zonal Officer, J&K Bank, South Zone, near SSP Office, Pulwama.
3. Cluster Head, J&K Bank, District, Shopian.
4. Branch Manager, J&K Bank Branch Pinjoora, District Shopian.
5. Union Territory of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to
Government, Revenue Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
6. Deputy Commissioner/Additional Deputy Commissioner, Mini Secretariat, District Shopian.
7. Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) ZainaPora Shopian.
8. Sub-Divisiona! Police Officer (SDPO) ZainaPora Shopian.
9. Tehsildar Barbugh Imam Sahib District Shopian. ...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms Insha Rashid, Adv.
Ms Taniya, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
J U D G M E N T
Per Sanjeev Kumar, J
1. The petitioner is a borrower in default of the J&K Bank and is aggrieved by the proceedings initiated for recovery of loan amount in terms of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [“SARFAESI Act”], in particular, notice dated 13th April 2023 issued by the Authorised Officer of the Respondent Bank under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act 2002, read with Rule 8(1) of the Security (Enforcement) Interest Rules, 2002 [“Rules of 2002”], auction notice dated 22nd August 2023, confirmation of auction vide communication dated 14th September 2023 and a Sale Certificate dated 15th December 2023 issued by Respondent-Bank in favour of Respondent No. 10, the auction purchaser. There is also a challenge laid by the petitioner to a criminal complaint dated 9th October 2023 made against the petitioner to the police.
2. Before we advert to the grounds of challenge urged by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to state few facts as are germane to the disposal of this petition.
3. The petitioner initially approached Respondent Bank and availed Cash Credit Facility of Rs. 1,10,00,000 (Rs. One Crore and ten lacs only). Later, on the request of the petitioner, the aforementioned credit facility was enhanced to Rupees 1,45,00,000 (Rs. One Crore and forty-five lacs only). The aforesaid credit facilities were granted to the petitioner by Respondent Bank inter alia against following securities:
| Nature of Security | Description |
|---|---|
| Primary | Hypothecation of fruit and fruit crops and book debts and receivables. |
| Collateral | 1. Land measuring 10 Kanals falling under survey no 53 min(05 Kanals), Khata No 56, Khewat No 13 and Survey No 456/5(05 Kanals), Khata No 1L6, Khewat No 25 situated at Nully Poshwari 2. Land measuring 01 Kanal 03 ‰ marlas falling under survey No. 176(11 Marlas), 320 (12 ‰ Marlas) Khata No |

4. It seems that after some time, the loan account became irregular on account of failure of the petitioner to repay the credit interest on time. Despite repeated requests and reminders by the bank, the petitioner failed to get his loan account regularised. The petitioner also failed to make payment of outstanding amount under the Loan Account despite having received several demands from the bank. The petitioner neither got his loan account regularised by making the requisite payment nor did he square his debt. This constrained the Respondent Bank to declare the loan account of the petitioner as Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 31st of March 2019. The petitioner was called upon to pay outstanding amount, which he failed to pay. Faced with failure of the petitioner to clear its outstanding amount and liability towards the bank, proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 were set in motion by the Respondent Bank. Composite Demand Notice dated 27th of June 2019 under Section 13 (2) of SARFAESI 2002 was served upon the petitioner requesting him to discharge his liability in full within 60 days from the date of notice. Despite having received the demand notice dated 27th of June 2019, the petitioner did not bother to come forward and clear his outstanding dues.
5. The process of recovery was taken further. The Respondent Bank issued Possession Notice dated 13th of April 2023 in terms of Rule 8(1) and (2) and Appendix IV of the Rules of 2002 with respect to the property which was mortgaged by the petitioner by way of collateral security. After taking over the possession, Respondent Bank issued e-Auction/Sale Notice dated 6th June 2023 putting the mortgaged properties to auction. In terms of the e- tender notice dated 6th of June 2023, a simultaneous notice in terms of Rule 9 (1) of the Rules of 2002 was also given to the petitioner to pay the dues of the bank outstanding against him in his loan account together with interest, charges, expenses etc. within 15 days from this notice. The bid was stated to be opened on 20th June 2023 at 3:00 PM. It se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.