HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
BALWINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF J AND K AND ORS (LAW DEPARTMENT/HIGH COURT) (High Court Matter) – Respondent
WP(C) 2849 / 2019
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP (C) No. 2849/2019
Reserved on: 24.12.2025
Pronounced on: 30.12.2025
Uploaded on: 30.12.2025
Whether the operative part or full
judgment is pronounced: FULL
Balwinder Kumar, Age 42 years
S/o Sham Lal
R/o Village Gudwal, P.O Vijaypur
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Tehsil Vijaypur District Samba.
Through: Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Wani, Adv.
Vs.
1. The State of J&K Through its
Commissioner/Secretary to Govt.
...Respondent(s)
Deptt. of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs
Civil Secretariat Srinagar/ Jammu.
2. Secretary to Govt. of J&K
Social Welfare Department,
Civil Secretariat, Srinagar/Jammu.
3. The High court of Jammu and Kashmir
Through its Registrar General, Srinagar/Jammu.
4. The Principal Secretary to Hon’ble Chief Justice
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir.
Chief Justice’s Secretariat, Srinagar/Jammu.
5. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Baramula,
(Chairman Interview committee for Class-IV of
District Baramulla)
Through: Mr. Aatir Javed Kawoosa, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
J U D G M E N T
Per Sanjeev Kumar, J
1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the
petitioner seeks following directions:-
i. Commanding and directing the respondents to
amend/clarify rule 11 and 12 of Jammu and Kashmir
Ministerial staff of Subordinates court service, so that
WP (C) No. 2849/2019 Page 1 of 9
Mohd Altaf Nima
I attest to the accuracy
and authenticity of this
document
30.12.2025
##PAGE2##same may be read as inconsonance with Rule-5 of J&K
Reservation Rules 2005 dated 21.10.2005 issued vide
SRO-294 dated 21.10.2005.
ii. Commanding and directing the respondents to amend
Clause-I (I) (A) of advertisement notice no. 01 of 2019
dated 10.01.2019 issued by respondent no. 4 for filling
District cadre post of Orderly in District Baramulla.
iii. Commanding and directing the respondents to allow the
petitioner to participate in the process of selection for the
post of Orderly in District cadre Baramulla as petitioner
was shortlisted for interview/viva voce and his name was
figured at serial no. 623.
iv. Commanding and directing the respondents to select and
appoint the petitioner against the post of Orderly under
schedule cast category in District cadre Baramulla
figuring at serial no. 31 of Annexure-A to the
advertisement notice no. 01 of 2019 dated 10.01.2019 as
the petitioner has applied for the same and has been
shortlisted for interview/viva voce for the said post.
BRIEF FACTS.
2. Vide advertisement notification No. 01 of 2019 dated 10th of January
2019, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir (Chief Justice’s Secretariat)
invited online applications from eligible candidates for participating in the
selection process for various posts borne on Divisional and District cadres of
District judiciary of Jammu and Kashmir. The notified vacancies included
nine posts of Orderly borne on District cadre Baramulla with the category
wise breakup as under:-
OM 5
RBA 2
SC 1
ST 1
3. The petitioner being a candidate belonging to SC Category and
possessing the eligibility qualification of matriculation submitted his online
application for the post of Orderly in District Baramulla against the lone post
earmarked for SC Category. The respondent in his application clearly
disclosed his permanent residence in District Samba. The petitioner was
WP (C) No. 2849/2019 Page 2 of 9
Mohd Altaf Nima
I attest to the accuracy
and authenticity of this
document
30.12.2025
##PAGE3##amongst the candidates shortlisted for viva voce. The name of the petitioner
figured at serial No. 623 in the shortlist of candidates selected for interview
for the post of Orderly (Class IV) in District Baramulla. The interview of the
petitioner was scheduled to be held in the office of respondent No. 5 i.e.,
Principal District and Session Judge Baramulla on 16th of July 2019. The
petitioner responded to call for interview and appeared before respondent
No. 5 for the purpose on the date fixed. However, he was not permitted to
partici
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.