HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
ASHOK SHARMA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
ANIL SHARMA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
MA 76 / 2025
##PAGE1##
Serial No. 148
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
MA No. 76/2025
Dr. Ashok Sharma and others
…..Appellants
Through: Mr. Vikram Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Sachin Dev Singh, Advocate &
Mr. Irfaan Khan, Advocate
Vs
Anil Sharma and another.
.…. Respondents
Through: Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Paras Gupta, Advocate,
Mr. Ravi Abrol, Advocate &
Mr. Parimoksh Seth, Advocate.
Mr. K. S. Johal, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Supreet Singh Johal, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER
(30.12.2025)
1. Through the medium of this order, this Court is
granting disposal to the present appeal preferred under the
spell of Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
2. The respondent – Anil Sharma, the plaintiff has
preferred a civil suit filed by him before the court of learned 2nd
Additional District Judge, Jammu wherein the respondent –
Anil Sharma is seeking a decree of declaration, decree of
permanent prohibitory injunction and decree of mandatory
injunction all independent to each other against the four
##PAGE2##2 MA No. 76/2025
defendants, three of whom are the appellants herein whereas
the fourth defendant is the proforma respondent in the present
appeal.
3. In the civil suit, the respondent-Anil Sharma is
claiming the reliefs as under:-
i. Pass a decree of declaration declaring that the
plaintiff is the prior, continuous and exclusive user of
the trade name/trade mark "SDDM Hospital" in
respect of hospital and healthcare services conducted
at the suit premises since the year 2014, and that the
defendants have no right, title or interest therein;
ii. Pass a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
restraining the defendants, their agents, servants,
employees, representatives, licensees or any other
person acting for or on their behalf, from using the
trade name/ trade mark “SDDM Hospital” or any
other name or mark identical with or deceptively
similar thereto, in relation to hospital or medical
services, in any manner whatsoever, within the Union
Territory of Jammu & Kashmir or such other area as
this Hon’ble Court may deem fit;
iii. Pass a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
restraining the defendants from in any manner
interfering with, intruding upon or dealing with the
management, administration, staff, machinery,
equipment, records, finances or day-to-day operations
of the plaintiff’s hospital, namely SDDM Hospital,
situated at Channi Himmat, Jammu.
iv. Pass a decree of mandatory injunction directing the
defendants to forthwith return and restore all
machinery, medical equipment and other hospital
assets unauthorizedly removed from the plaintiff’s
hospital;
v. Pass a decree of injunction restraining the defendants
from threatening, intimidating, coercing or influencing
##PAGE3##3 MA No. 76/2025
the doctors, nursing staff, employees or any other
persons associated with or working at the plaintiff’s
hospital;
vi. Award costs of the suit in favour of the plaintiff; and
vii. Grant such other or further reliefs, including incidental
and consequential reliefs, as this Hon’ble Court may
deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of
the case.
4. Accompanying his said civil suit is an application
preferred under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 wherein the respondent – Anil Sharma has
sought issuance of temporary injunction for restraining all the
four defendants, their agents, servants, representatives and all
persons acting through or under them from entering,
interfering with or operating the respondent-Anil Sharma’s
hospital premises at Channi Himmat, Jammu or in any manner
interfering with the management, administration, staff,
machinery, equipment and records of the respondent’s hospital
and further asking for temporary injunction restraining said
four defendants, their agents, servants, representatives and all
persons acting through or under them from using the name
and style as “SDDM Hospital” or any name deceptively similar
to the respondent-Anil Sharma’s hospital until the final
disposal of the suit.
##PAGE4#
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.