Sr. No. 133

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Gurbaksh Singh …..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Advocate

Vs

UT of J&K Th SHO Incharge Police .…. Respondent(s)

Station Satwari and others

Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy. AG for R-1

Respondent No.2-Present in person

None for R-3

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE

ORDER

29.12.2025

(Oral)

1. Heard.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner

and the respondent No.2, who are husband and wife living together peacefully since years have already settled their matrimonial dispute that had led to the registration of the impugned case FIR bearing No.138/2019 dated 10.07.2019 of Police Station, Satwari, Jammu under Sections 498A, 308, 109 RPC and the filing of the subsequent charge-sheet titled „State vs Gurbaksh Singh and others‟ pending trial in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu. It is submitted that the proforma respondent No.3 is the mother of the petitioner and the mother-in-law of the respondent No.2, who was arrayed as co-accused in the FIR as well as

the charge-sheet.

3. The petitioner/accused and the respondent No.2/complainant, who are

present in the open