HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD AMIN SHAH AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MOHD ABDULLAH SHAH AND ORS. – Respondent
CM(M) 596 / 2025
##PAGE1##
Sr. No.133
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
(Through virtual mode)
Case:-CM(M) No. 596/20 25
CM No.8969/2025
Caveat Nos.3333/2025 & 3323/2025
Mohd. Amin Shah and anr. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Syed Riyaz Hussain, Advocate.
V/s
Mohd. Abdullah Shah and ors. …. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Syed Abid Parwaz, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICESANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
30.12.2025
1. The petitioners have challenged order dated 23rd December 2025 passed by
the learned Principal District Judge, Shopian(hereinafter „the appellate court‟)
whereby, application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against order
dated 25th October 2020 passed by the learned Sub Judge, Shopian has been
dismissed and, consequently, the appeal has also been dismissed.
2. Issued notice to the respondents.
3. Mr. Syed Abid Parwaz, who is on Caveat, accepts notice on behalf of the
respondents. With his appearance, Caveat(s) shall stand discharged.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and peruse the record.
5. It appears that the petitioners (herein after „the plaintiffs‟) have filed a suit
against the respondents (herein after „the defendants‟) before the court of learned
Sub Judge, Shopian seeking a declaration that they are entitled to half a portion of
the landed estate measuring 40 Kanals 7 marlas situated at village
Nazneenpora,Tehsil and District Sophian. A permanent injunction restraining the
defendants from interfering in plaintiffs‟ possession of the land measuring 13
##PAGE2##2
Kanals out of the suit land has also been sought. Besides this,the plaintiffs have
also sought partition and separate possession with a direction to the defendants1
and 2 to hand over possession of 7Kanals and 3 ½ marlas of land out of the suit
land to the plaintiffs.
6. It appears that during the pendency of the suit, on 19th of March 2013,the
learned Trial Court passed an interim order directing the parties to maintain status
quo on spot. The said order was made absolute on 25th March 2014, with the
consensus of the parties. Thereafter, the defendants 1and 2 filed an application
before the Trial Court seeking variation of order dated 25th March 2014 on the
ground that there has been change in the circumstances, in as much as the family
of the said defendants has increased, as a result of which, they need to construct a
residential house upon their share of the suit land, which is under their
possession. The said application was disposed of by the learned trial court in
terms of impugned order dated 25th October 2024 after inviting objections from
the plaintiffs and after hearing the parties. The learned trial Court permitted
defendant no.1 to raise construction upon the land which is in his possession
subject to furnishing of an undertaking that in case upon disposal of the suit, the
plaintiffs are found entitled to the portion of the land on which the construction
has been raised, the defendants will give land of equivalent value to the plaintiffs
in lieu of it.
7. Against the aforesaid order of the learned Trial Court, the plaintiffs filed an
appeal before the learned District Judge, Shopian on 5th March 2025. Along with
the appeal, the plaintiffs also filed an application for condonation of delay in
filing the appeal as the appeal was filed after a delay of about 100 days. The
learned Appellate Court, after hearing the parties, came to the conclusion that
plaintiffs/appellants have not explained the delay in filing the appeal and, as such,
##PAGE3##3
their application was dismissed, which resulted in a consequent dismissal of the
appeal.
8. The petitioners/plaintiffs have challenged the impugned orders on the
grounds that the learned appellate court has failed to consider the reasons that
were assigned by plaintiffs for seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
It has been further contended that there was no malafide or intentional inaction on
the part of the plaintiffs in filing the appeal and, as such, the delay in filing appeal
deserved to be condoned. It has been c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.