HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
SHABIR AHMED SHEIKH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION GOOL AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CRM(M) 564 / 2025
##PAGE1##
Sr. No. 86
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 564/2025
Shabir Ahmed ShCR eikh and another …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mohd. Nadeem Bhat, Advocate
Vs
Union Territory of J&K and another .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None for R-1.
Mr. Rohit Kumar Parihar, Advocate for R-2.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
27.12.2025
1. The private parties i.e. petitioner No.1 as well as the respondent
No.2/complainant are present in person too.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the private respondent that said
parties have already settled the matrimonial dispute that had led to the registration
of the impugned case FIR bearing No.09/2021 dated 20.02.2021 of Police Station
Gool, District Ramban and the filing of the subsequent charge-sheet bearing
Challan/File No.95/2021 dated 24.12.2021 pending trial in the Court of learned
Judicial Magistrate, Gool. It is submitted that the petitioner No.1 and the
respondent No.2 are living together as husband and wife peacefully and as such,
want the quashment of the pending criminal proceedings. The petitioner
No.1/accused and the respondent No.2/complainant present in the open Court
testify the fact of their mutual settlement. It is submitted by them that they have
been living peacefully as husband and wife and as such want the termination of the
criminal proceedings.
##PAGE2##2 CRM(M) No. 564/2025
3. In the backdrop of mutual settlement between the private parties and the
cordial maintenance of conjugal house by the petitioner No.1 and the respondent
No.2, this Court is of the considered opinion that it may meet the ends of justice, in
case, the instant petition is allowed and the impugned case FIR bearing No.09/2021
dated 20.02.2021 along with the subsequent charge-sheet bearing Challan/File
No.95/2021 dated 24.12.2021 pending disposal in the Court of learned Judicial
Magistrate, Gool are quashed as the same shall facilitate the cordial matrimonial
relation between the private parties.
4. The statements of the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 in support
of their mutual amicable settlement, stand already recorded.
5. Although this Court is of the opinion that an FIR cannot be generally and
in routine manner allowed to be quashed in exercise of the powers under Section
528 of BNSS corresponding to Section 482 of the Code on the main ground that the
parties have settled their controversy that had become the cause of occurrence, yet
exceptional ground appears to be made out in the opinion of the Court, in the facts
and the circumstances of the case, for invoking its extraordinary powers under
Section 528 of BNSS to quash the FIR in question.
6. The provisions of Section 359 of the BNSS corresponding to Section 320
of the Code do not restrict but limit and circumvent the powers of this Court under
Section 528 of the BNSS corresponding to Section 482 of the Code regarding
quashment of FIR’s and criminal proceedings for the sake of the society at large
which is real beneficiary of the criminal justice delivery system.
7. This Court in its opinion feels fortified with an authoritative judgment of
the Hon’ble Apex Court cited as “Gopal Kumar B. Nar Vs. CBI (2014) 5 SCC
800” in which it has been held that “though quashment of non-compoundable
offence under Section 482 CrPC, following a settlement between the parties would
##PAGE3##3 CRM(M) No. 564/2025
not amount to circumvention of Section 320, but such power has to be exercised
with care and caution and would depend on facts of each case.”
8. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Parbatbhai Aahir Alias Parbatbhai
Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors vs State of Gujarat and Anr. (2017) 9 SCC
641” has considered the aspect of the invocation of the inherent powers by the High
Courts under Section 528 of the BNSS corresponding to Section 482 of the Code
and was pleased to lay down some broad governing principles for invocation of
such power of the High Courts. The relevant portions of the judgment are
reproduced as under for the sake of convenience:
“Section 482 is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.