Sr. No. 86

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Shabir Ahmed ShCR eikh and another …..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Mohd. Nadeem Bhat, Advocate

Vs

Union Territory of J&K and another .…. Respondent(s)

Through: None for R-1.

Mr. Rohit Kumar Parihar, Advocate for R-2.

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE

ORDER

27.12.2025

1. The private parties i.e. petitioner No.1 as well as the respondent

No.2/complainant are present in person too.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the private respondent that said parties have already settled the matrimonial dispute that had led to the registration of the impugned case FIR bearing No.09/2021 dated 20.02.2021 of Police Station Gool, District Ramban and the filing of the subsequent charge-sheet bearing Challan/File No.95/2021 dated 24.12.2021 pending trial in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Gool. It is submitted that the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 are living together as husband and wife peacefully and as such, want the quashment of the pending criminal proceedings. The petitioner No.1/accused and the respondent No.2/complainant present in the open Court testify the fact of their mutual settlement. It is su