SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1645

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
SHAHID REHMAN MALIK – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K TH INCHARGE S.H.O. POLICE STATION PEER MITHA JAMMU AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Sr. No. 75

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Shahid Rehman M alik …..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Siddhant Gupta, Advocate

Vs

UT of J&K and another .…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Zeeshan Malik, Advocate for R-2

None for R-1

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE

ORDER

27.12.2025

(ORAL)

1. The private parties i.e. the petitioner/accused and the respondent

No.2/complainant are also present in person.

2. It is submitted by their learned counsel that the said private parties have

entered into a mutual settlement in respect of the incident that had led to the registration of the impugned case FIR bearing No.71/2015 dated 23.11.2015 registered with the Police Station, Peer Mitha, Jammu and the consequent charge-sheet pending disposal in the Court of the learned

Excise Magistrate, Jammu under the title „State vs Shahid Rehman Malik‟.

3. It is submitted that the respondent No.2/complainant is now married and

she does not, as per the compromise, want the criminal proceedings to go, so that she is not in connection with the trial proceedings required to attend

at trial of the case as a married girl.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the private parties that this Court

may i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top