2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1650
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sanjay Dhar, J
RUBEENA BANO – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (SCHOOL EDUCATION) AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP(C) 3263 / 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sabreena Fayaz
For the Respondents: None
Advertisement notices for engagements co-terminus with a specific financial year automatically lapse if the selection process is not concluded within that timeframe, eliminating the necessity for formal cancellation before issuing new notices for subsequent financial years.
Headnote:(A) Service Law - Engagement of personnel - Time-bound Advertisement Notice - Financial Year - Lapsing of advertisement - Where engagement is specifically stipulated to be co-terminus with a particular financial year, if the selection process is not concluded within that financial year, the Advertisement Notice automatically lapses by efflux of time - No requirement to formally cancel or withdraw such a notice before issuing a fresh advertisement for the subsequent financial year. (Paras 6-7)
Facts of the case:
A petition was filed seeking a direction for appointment to a post based on an advertisement notice for a specific financial year. The petitioner challenged a subsequent advertisement notice for the same post for the following financial year, contending that the first process had not been concluded or formally cancelled. The first selection process was delayed due to an enquiry into the residency of the top-ranked candidate, extending beyond the end of the relevant financial year.
Findings of Court:
The court found that since the first advertisement was restricted to a specific financial year and the engagement was co-terminus with that year, the notice lapsed automatically once the financial year ended. There was no legal necessity to cancel the first notice before inviting applications for the next financial year.
Issues: Whether a fresh advertisement for a time-bound engagement can be issued without formally cancelling a previous advertisement that remained unconcluded due to the expiration of the relevant financial year.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that an advertisement restricted to a specific financial year, where engagement is co-terminus with that period, automatically lapses if the selection process is not completed within that timeframe. Consequently, the authority is not required to issue a formal cancellation before initiating a new recruitment process for the next period.
Result: The petition was dismissed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
administrative law
-
public employment
- engagement of helpers
-
public employment
-
practice and procedure
-
writ jurisdiction
- challenge to advertisement
-
writ jurisdiction
S. No.58
Suppl.1 List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 3263/2025
CMNo.8777/2025
Date of pronouncement: 27.12.2025
Uploaded on: 29.12.2025
RUBEENA BANO
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Sabreena Fayaz, Advocate
V/s
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS
.....Respondent(s)
Through : None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
1. The petitioner through the medium of present writ petition
has sought a direction upon the respondents to consider and issue
appointment order in her favour against the post of Helper/Aaya
under the ECCE Scheme in Primary School Tengripora Gowass
pursuant to Advertisement Notice dated 11.11.2023. She has also
challenged the Advertisement Notice dated 10.06.2024, whereby
fresh applications for engagement of Helper/Aaya under ECCE in
respect of Primary School, Tengripora have been invited.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused record
of the case.
##PAGE2##3. It appears that Advertisement Notification dated 11.11.2023
came to be issued by respondent No.4, whereby, inter alia,
applications were invited for engagement of Helpers/Aayas under
ECCE in Primary School Tengripora. It also appears that the
petitioner and one Rubeena Karim applied for the said post in
pursuance of the aforesaid Advertisement Notice. A panel of
candidates was prepared by the Selection Committee and Ms
Rubeena Karim was placed at S.No.1 of the said panel, whereas the
petitioner was placed at S.No.2.
4. It also appears that the petitioner filed objections to the said
panel alleging that Ms Rubeena Karim is not the resident of the
relevant area on the ground that she has shifted after her marriage
and is residing in a different village. An enquiry was conducted by
the respondents into the issue and the process of selection was not
taken to its logical conclusion. During the enquiry/verification it
came to the fore that Ms Rubeena Karim has entered into wedlock
with Nisar Ahmad Mirasi who lives in a different village. On
18.03.2024, Tehsildar Shangus reported that the aforenamed Nisar
Ahmad Mirasi, husband of Rubeena Karim is residing in revenue
village Chowgam. In the meantime, another Advertisement Notice
came to be issued by respondent No.5 on 10.06.2024, whereby
applications were invited for engagement of Helper/Aaya, inter alia,
for Primary School Tengripora.
WP(C) No.3263 of 2025 Page 2 of 4
##PAGE3##5. The contention of the petitioner is that without cancelling the
first Advertisement Notice or without taking the process initiated
vide the said Advertisement Notice to its logical conclusion,
respondent No.5 could not have issued the impugned Advertisement
notice dated 10.06.2024.
6. In the above context it is to be noted that Advertisement
Notice dated 11.11.2023 was limited to the engagement of Aayas for
financial year 2023-2024 and the engagement was co-terminus with
the said financial year, which is clearly stipulated in the
advertisement notice. Since the enquiry/credentials of selected
candidate, namely Rubeena Karim, stretched up to March, 2024,
therefore, by that time the financial year 2023-2024 had come to an
end. In these circumstances, there was no need to cancel the
Advertisement Notice dated 11.11.2023 before issuing a fresh
Advertisement Notice for engagement of Aayas for the financial
year 2024-2025. The said Advertisement Notice is also restricted to
one financial year and the engagement is co-terminus with financial
year 2024-2025, meaning thereby that after culmination of financial
year a fresh Advertisement Notice has to be issued by respondent
No.5. If the selection process is not concluded within a particular
financial year, the Advertisement Notice automatically lapses and
there is no need to issue a cancellation or withdrawal of the
Advertisement Notice.
WP(C) No.3263 of 2025 Page 3 of 4
##PAGE4##7. In these circumstances there was no need for the respondents
to cancel the subject advertisement notice nor can the respondents
proceed to conclude the selection process in respect of the said
advertisem