2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1666
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
INHABITANTS OF VILLAGE KALSIAN TH BAHADUR NATH – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS (R AND B) DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP(C) 2990 / 2025
##PAGE1##
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU &h475 KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No.2990/2025
Reserved on: 23.12.2025
Pronounced on: 26.12.2025
Uploaded on : 26.12.2025
Inhabitants of Village Kalsian, Panchayat Kalsina, through its representative
Bahadur Nath, Age 69 years Ex-Sarpanch, Panchayat Kalsian
S/o Late Sh. Paras Ram R/o Village Kalsian
Tehsil Nowshera, District Rajouri ....Petitioner(s)
Through:-Mr. Waheed Choudhary, Advocate
V/s
1. UT of Jammu and Kashmir
Through Commissioner Secretary PWD (R&B),
Department of Civil Secretariat, Jammu.
2. Chief Engineer, PWD (R&B), Jammu.
3. Superintendent Engineer PWD(R&B), Circle Rajouri.
4. Executive Engineer PWF(R&B), Nowshera.
5. Parveen Sharma, S/o Tilak Raj
R/o Village Kurlian, Tehsil Kalakote District Rajouri
6. Sh. Surinder Choudhary
Hon’ble Deputy CM, (Minister for PWD 9R&B)
UT of Jammu & Kashmir.
...Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-1 to 4
Mr. Mazhar Ali Khan, Advocate for R-5
None for R-6
Coram: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
JUDGMENT
1. By way of this writ petition, filed on behalf of inhabitants of village
Kalsian through Bahadur Nath, in representative capacity, the
petitioners have invoked extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court
vested under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to quash allotment
order No.SER/R&B/46/4864-68, whereby work for construction of 45
##PAGE2##2
meters span motorable bridge along with approach road connected to
Kalsian Satsang Ghat to Handan Tanda, has been allotted in favour of
respondent No.5, in terms of e-NIT No.12 of 2025-26 dated 03.07.2025.
A further direction is sought upon the respondents, more particularly
respondent No.5 to execute the work strictly as per the DPR prepared
and approved.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The case of the petitioners, as projected in the writ petition, is that in the
year 2023, people of Kalsian and Handan Tanda Panchayat approached
the concerned MLA for completion of pending work, which involves
construction of 20 meter span of motorable bridge along with approach
road connecting Kalsian Satsang Ghar to Handan Tanda. On the
recommendations of the then MLA, DPR for construction of remaining
20 meter motorable span bridge alongwith existing approach road, was
duly prepared and forwarded to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 under
NABARD scheme.
3. It is stated that while issuance of e-NIT was under consideration,
election in the UT of Jammu & Kashmir was announced, as such, NIT
could not be issued due to imposition of model code of conduct. The
grievance of the petitioner is that after the election was over and
government formed, respondent No.6, elected MLA from the
constituency, who happened to be the Deputy Chief Minister having
portfolio of PWD (R&B), in order to show his power in the political
##PAGE3##3
corridor, managed shifting of the aforesaid work to some other place
under the same nomenclature, got the DPR approved on 08.07.2023,
and got the NIT issued for allotment of contract under new alignment,
which is about six hundred meter away from the already existing road.
The petitioner along with other members of the Panchayat stated to have
approached respondent No.6 with their grievance but of no avail,
aggrieved whereby the petitioners approached this Court by way of
present writ petition on the ground that though the e-NIT has been
issued with the same nomenclature but for totally different work, which
is contrary to the earlier DPR; once the DPR has been approved, same
cannot be shifted to other place without any justifiable reason; besides,
approach road between kalsian Satsangh Ghar to Handan Tanda, pillars
of the bridge connecting both the villages, have already been
constructed and only 20 meter motorable bridge was required to be
constructed, as such, the respondents are duty bound to complete the
execution of work in terms of the earlier DPR dated 08.07.2023;
shifting of the alignment remained unexplained by the official
respondents.
4. Per contra, official respondents have resisted the claim of the
petitioners by filing their objections. It is