HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MODERN CRICKET CLUB TH SUDERSHAN MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA (BCCI) TH ITS SECRETARY MUMBAI AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP(C) 3331 / 2025
##PAGE1##
S. No. 28
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU &h475 KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3331/2025
CM No. 7868/2025
CM No. 7591/2025
Pronounced on: 26.12.2025
Uploaded on: 27.12.2025
Modern Cricket Club
...Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Mr Abhirash Sharma, Advocate
v.
Board of Control for
Cricket in India (BCCI) and others
...Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Rajat Gupta, Advocate for R-1 & 2
Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate for R-5
Coram:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
(Oral)
01/- In this petition petitioner, Modern Cricket Club, has challenged order
dated 19.03.2025, passed by respondent no. 4, whereby he has opined that
faction headed by Sh. Balbir Singh Chib be recognised for the limited purpose
of taking part in the voting for the forthcoming elections of Jammu and
Kashmir Cricket Association, (hereinafter to be referred as JKCA), with
respect to representation of Modern Cricket Club, Jammu. Petitioner-Club is
also seeking a direction upon respondent no. 2 to take over the entire control
of affairs for conducting of election of JKCA, in pursuance to the order dated
27.10.2025, passed by the Supreme Court, by ignoring order impugned dated
17.11.2025, issued by respondent no. 2 and further to issue election calendar
for the election of JKCA as per election norms and Constitution of JKCA,
##PAGE2##2
thereby, accepting the nomination paper of the President of the petitioner club
to participate in the election meeting of JKCA and to contest the election of
president of JKCA.
FACTUAL MATRIX
02/- The petitioner is a cricket club comprising of Twelve (12) members, out
of which five (5) are its office bearers and seven (7) are its executive
members. As per the petitioner, he is the President of the club since 1998.
JKCA has not been conducting its elections since July 2016, therefore, number
of petitions were instituted for conducting of elections of JKCA in terms of the
recommendations of Lodha committee, the petitions were clubbed and
disposed of by the this court vide order dated 23.03.2021 passed in LPA no.
14/2019, with a direction to BCCI to constitute a committee to run affairs of
JKCA, the said committee of BCCI was also directed to constitute a sub-
committee to run the affairs of JKCA, till the elections are held. Accordingly a
sub committee comprising of three members was constituted.
03/- The dispute with respect to delay in conducting the election of JKCA
was also agitated before Supreme Court in a Civil Appeal no. 4325/2014,
titled as Board of Control for Cricket in India v/s Cricket Association, Bihar &
Ors. Supreme Court vide order dated 27.10.2025 appointed respondent no.3 as
Electoral Officer for conducting the election of JKCA, in accordance with the
approved Constitution within a period of 12 weeks from the date of passing of
the order. Respondent no. 3, accordingly, accepted the assignment of being
Electoral Officer for conducting the election of JKCA.
##PAGE3##3
04/- The grievance of the petitioner is that the member administration,
JKCA, vide letter dated 12.11.2025, forwarded a copy of the order passed by
respondent no. 4 dated 19.03.2025, for information to the President of Modern
Cricket Club, Jammu, by referring the internal dispute of the Modern Cricket
Club, Jammu, with the allegations that there are two factions, one headed by
Balbir Singh Chib and other headed by Mr Sudarshan Mehta and opined that
the faction headed by Balbir Singh Chib be recognised for the limited purpose
of taking part in the voting for the forthcoming election of JKCA.
05/- It is stated that respondent no. 4 has found Shri Balbir Singh Chib as
valid representative of Modern Cricket Club only on the ground that he has
responded to the notice issued by respondent no. 4 and the petitioner had not
responded to the same. It is stated that the Ombudsman Respondent no. 4, has
passed the order impugned without jurisdiction on the ground that he was not
holding the charge of Ombudsman on 19.03.2025 and his term stood expired
on 01.11
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.