HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION LARNOO (HOME) – Appellant
Versus
BILAL AHMAD WANI AND ORS. – Respondent
CrlA(AS) 35 / 2024
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT
SRINAGAR
Reserved on: 18.12.2025
Pronounced on:26.12.2025
Uploaded on: 26.12.2025
Whether the operative part
or full judgment is
pronounced: Full
CrlA(AS) No.35/2024
UT OF J&K ...PETITIONERS/APPELLANT(S)
Through: - Mr. Ilyas Laway, GA.
Vs.
BILAL AHMAD WANI & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S)
Through: - Mr. Syed Sajad Geelani, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
JUDGMENT
1) The appellant Union Territory of J&K through the
medium of present appeal has assailed the judgment of
acquittal dated 12.10.2023 passed by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Anantnag (“the trial court”), whereby the
respondents/accused have been acquitted of the charges in
a case arising out of FIR No.5/2020 for offences under
Section 376-D, 509, 506, 120-B, 201 IPC and Section 67 of
the I.T Act registered with Police Station, Larnoo.
2) Briefly stated, the facts leading to the filing of the
present appeal are that on 29.04.2020, PW-1 (the
prosecutrix) lodged a report with the police alleging therein
CrlA(AS) No.35/2024 Page 1 of 11
##PAGE2##that a few days back at about 11.00 am, while she was
sitting at her home along with two minor children, accused
Asif Ahamd and Bilal Ahmad Wani trespassed into her home
whereafter they enticed her two minor children and brought
them out of the home. Thereafter the afore-named two
accused persons made the prosecutrix to take some
intoxicating medicine with juice and cigarette, as a result of
which she lost her senses. The afore-named two accused
thereafter committed rape upon her. They also videographed
the act and circulated the said video through WhatsApp, as
a result of which the prosecutrix and her family faced a lot
of indignation. It was also alleged that the afore-named two
accused extended life threats to the prosecutrix in case she
lodged the report with the police. It was further alleged in the
report that accused Ilyas is also involved in this crime.
3) After registration of the FIR, investigation of the case
was set into motion during which statements of the
witnesses under Section 161/164 of the Cr. P. C were
recorded. It was found that besides above named accused,
other accused/respondents are also involved in the crime.
On 19.07.2020, accused Bilal Ahmad was taken into
custody and on the basis of his disclosure statement, one
memory card and mobile phone along with invoice in respect
CrlA(AS) No.35/2024 Page 2 of 11
##PAGE3##of the said mobile phone were recovered and seized. The
mobile phone and the memory card were sealed in presence
of the Executive Magistrate and the same were sent to FSL,
Srinagar, for analysis. After investigation of the case,
offences under Section 376-D, 509, 506, 120-B, 201 of IPC
and 67 IT Act were found established against the
accused/respondents and the challan was laid before the
trial court.
4) Vide order dated 25.02.2021, charges for offences
under Section 376-D, 509, 506, 120-B IPC and 67 IT Act
were framed against accused/respondent Bilal Ahmad
whereas charges for offences under Section 376-D, 120-B,
509 IPC and 67 IT Act were framed against
respondents/accused Sajad Ahmad Khatana, Nazakat Ali
Khatana, Aamir Suhail Khatana, Mohammad Ilyas Khatan,
Barkat Ali Khatana. The respondents/accused denied the
charges and claimed to be tried. Accordingly, the
prosecution was directed to lead evidence in support of the
charges.
5) During trial of the case, the prosecution, besides
examining PW-1, the prosecutrix, examined PW-2, Javaid
Ahmad Khatana, PW-5 Nisar Ahmad ASI, PW-6 Head
Constable Mohammad Akhter, PW-7 Reyaz Ahmad Shah
CrlA(AS) No.35/2024 Page 3 of 11
##PAGE4##and PW-8 Head Constable Mushtaq Ahmad, as witnesses in
support of its case.
6) At this stage, it seems that the accused made an
application for truncating the proceedings before the learned
trial court. After hearing the parties and after considering
the evidence on record and keeping in view the fact that the
prosecutrix had turned hostile, the learned trial court
allowed the application and proceeded to pass the impugne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.