HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
SHAKEEL-UL-REHMAN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION WOMENS ANANTNAG AND ANR – Respondent
CRM(M) 162 / 2023
##PAGE1##
1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
Case No. CrLM No. 150/2024
CRM(M) No. 162/2023
Reserved on: - 12.12.2025
Pronounced on: - 26.12.2025
Uploaded on: - 26.12.2025
Whether the operative part or full
judgment is pronounced: - Full.
Shakeel-ul-Rehman and Anr. …. Appellant(s)
Through: - Mr. Sheikh Younis, Advocate
V/s
Station House Officer Women Police Station Anantnag &
Anr.
Through: - Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, GA
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
JUDGMENT
01. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to
challenge FIR No. 06/2023 registered under Sections 498-A IPC and Section 4
of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, at Police Station Women, Anantnag, at the
instance of respondent No. 2. The principal ground urged is that the impugned
FIR is a clear abuse of the process of law, having been lodged with mala fide
intent after respondent No. 2 had already resorted to multiple civil and quasi-
criminal proceedings against petitioner No. 1.
02. It is contended that respondent No. 2 had earlier filed a petition under
Section 125 Cr. PC seeking maintenance for herself and the minor child, and
Mohammad Yaseen Dar
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document
##PAGE2##2
had also initiated proceedings under Section 12 of the Protection of Women
from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Both these proceedings were instituted on
24.08.2022, after respondent No. 2 had been divorced by petitioner No. 1.
According to the petitioners, the divorce was necessitated by the conduct of
respondent No. 2, who was married in the year 2016 and had a child out of the
wedlock. It is alleged that after some years of marriage, respondent No. 2 was
unwilling to discharge her marital obligations and intended to ruin the
matrimonial life of petitioner No. 1. Despite repeated attempts at reconciliation,
the matrimonial discord could not be resolved, compelling petitioner No. 1 to
pronounce divorce on three occasions, i.e., on 02.08.2022, 06.09.2022, and
finally on 06.10.2022.
03. It is further alleged that while the aforesaid proceedings under Section
125 Cr. PC and the Domestic Violence Act were pending, and while respondent
No. 2 was residing separately, she, with a view to harass and falsely implicate
petitioner No. 1 and his mother, concocted the present FIR. According to the
petitioners, this is evident from the fact that the allegations contained in the FIR
are inconsistent with the pleadings taken by respondent No. 2 in the earlier
proceedings. It is asserted that the allegation of demand of dowry, now raised
in the FIR, is wholly false, imaginary, and motivated, and is a result of personal
vendetta arising out of the second marriage of petitioner No. 1. It is alleged that
the FIR has been lodged only to subject the petitioners to police harassment and
to coerce them into an unwarranted settlement. It is thus pleaded that the
essential ingredients of the offences alleged are not made out and that even the
investigation conducted by respondent No. 1 has not been fair.
Mohammad Yaseen Dar
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document
##PAGE3##3
04. Upon notice, the respondents filed a status report stating that on
28.03.2023 respondent No. 2 approached the Women’s Police Station,
Anantnag, with a written complaint duly endorsed by the Senior Superintendent
of Police, Anantnag. In her complaint, respondent No. 2 alleged that her
marriage with petitioner No. 1 had been solemnized and that after one year of
marriage she was subjected to mental and physical cruelty and was harassed on
account of dowry demands. It was further alleged that her father had availed a
loan of ₹16.00 lakhs from J&K Bank, out of which part of the amount was paid
to petitioner No. 1 as dowry. She further alleged that in the year 2022 she was
thrown out of the matrimonial home by petitioner No. 1 and his mother, and
that petitioner No. 1 had contracted a second marriage, thereby rendering her
life miserable.
05. On receipt of the complaint, FIR No. 06/2023 under Sections 4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.