HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
UT OF J AND K TH CHIEF SECRETARY JAMMU AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
GULSHAN ARA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
LPA 57 / 2025
##PAGE1##
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Reserved on: 16.12.2025
Pronounced on 24.12.2025
Uploaded on 24.12.2025
Whether the operative part or full judgment
is pronounced: Full Judgment
CJ Court:
Case: LPA No. 57/2025 in
OWP No. 772/2004
CM Nos. 1792-1793/2025
1. State (now U.T.) of J&K through Chief …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Secretary to Govt. Civil Secretariat,
J&K Jammu/Srinagar.
2. Chief Engineer, Power Development
Department (EM& RE), Jammu.
3. Divisional Engineer, Electricity
Department, Prade Ground, Jammu.
4. Director General of Police, J&K,
Jammu.
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, Sr. Advocate (AAG) with
Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Assisting Counsel.
v/s
…. Respondent(s)
1. Gulshan Ara Age 22 years Wd/o
Late Sh. Liaqat Ali.
2. Kashif Ali, age 03 years S/o Late Sh.
Liaqat Ali (Minor through the
natural Guardian)
–both residents of Choudhary
(Rehtal), Tehsil and District Rajouri.
Through:
##PAGE2##2
LPA No. 57/2025
CORAM: HON‟BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON‟BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
JUDGMENT
-
‘OSWAL J’
CM NO. 1792/2025
1. This is an application seeking condonation of 201 days‟ delay in filing the
accompanying appeal.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with the submissions
made at bar, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the delay in filing
the appeal is condoned.
3. Application is disposed of.
4. Main appeal is taken up on board.
LPA No. 57/2025
5. The instant intra-court appeal is directed against the judgment dated
02.04.2024 passed by the learned Writ Court in OWP No. 772/2004,
titled, „Gulshan Ara and Anr. vs. State of J&K and Ors’, whereby the
learned Writ Court has held the respondents entitled to compensation to
the tune of Rs. 16,53,652/- alongwith simple interest @ 6% per annum
from the date of filing of the writ petition until its recovery and fastened
the liability of payment on the appellants.
6. The appellants have challenged the judgment dated 02.04.2024 primarily
on the ground that the writ petition involved disputed questions of fact.
They contend that these issues require adjudication by a Civil Court and
fall beyond the proper scope of writ jurisdiction. It is further contended
that, pursuant to Government Order No. 723-GR (GAD) of 1990 dated
##PAGE3##3
LPA No. 57/2025
10.07.1090, the respondents were entitled only to ex-gratia relief for the
amount of Rs. 5.00 lacs, as the deceased was a member of the police
force. The appellants maintain that there being no negligence on the part
of the officials of the Power Development Department in relation to the
electrocution of the deceased, they cannot be held responsible for the
occurrence, and that the liability for payment of the said amount was
improperly fastened upon them.
7. Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG, submitted that the learned Writ Court
ought to have relegated the respondents to the Civil Court for redressal of
their grievance as they had sought compensation in a writ petition
involving disputed questions of fact. It is further submitted that in terms
of Government order dated 10.07.1990, the respondents were entitled only
to ex-gratia relief to the extent of Rs. 5.00 lacs.
8. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record.
9. The record depicts that the respondents had filed the writ petition for
commanding the appellants to pay compensation of Rs. 25.35 lacs
alongwith interest @ 12% per annum on account of the demise of Liaqat
Ali, who was the husband of respondent No. 1 and father of respondent
No. 2. The incident took place near TCP Nagrota at about 5:00 a.m. on
03.12.2003, when the deceased, Liaqat Ali, came into contact with a live
electric wire that had fallen to the ground. Liaqat Ali was serving as a
Selection Grade Constable with Traffic Police and posted on the National
Highway. The case projected by the respondents was that, while Liaqat
Ali had gone to attend the call of nature, he came into contact with a live
##PAGE4##4
LPA No. 57/2025
electric wire lying on a public way, as a result whereof, he suffered
serious burn injuries. He was immediately rushed to the Go
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.