2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1694
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
LT.COL YESH PAUL SHARMA (Retd.) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARYMINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP(C) 1736 / 2023
##PAGE1##
Regular List
Serial No. 18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND
LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1736/2023
Date of pronouncement : 24.12.2025
Uploaded on : 05.01.2026
Lt. Col. Yesh Paul Sharma (Retd.)
….Petitioner
Through:- Petitioner present in person
V/s
Union of India & Ors.
…..Respondents
Through:- Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with
Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel
Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with
Mr. Sumant Sudan, Advocate.
\
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
01. Pursuant to the direction given by this Court in its
detailed order dated 14.11.2025, Mr. Israr Ahmed-
Collector Land Acquisition, Defence, Rajouri-Poonch
Headquarter at Rajouri, is present in person along
with the record related to the acquisition in reference.
02. The Collector Land Acquisition, Defence, Rajouri-
Poonch (Rajouri) by reference to the apportionment
statement of the land refers to the fact that the land
comprised in khasra No. 1656-(measuring 17.19
WP(C) No. 1736/2023 Page 1 of 8
##PAGE2##kanals), 1670-(measuring 26.04 kanals) and 1658-
(measuring 19.17 kanals) coming under acquisition
was 64 kanals
03. Out of this 64 kanals of acquired land, the petitioner
No. 1- Badri Nath now deceased, along with his two
brothers namely, Tej Ram and Paras Ram are said to
be the owners of one and a half-(1‰) share i.e. 32
kanals and amongst themselves one-third (1/3rd
share each that is 10.13 kanals, came in their share.
04. As per the apportionment statement, the
compensation for the individual share of Tej Ram was
received by his son Subash Chander and Som Dutt for
an amount of Rs. 15,70,133/-. The payment is said
to have been made vide cheque dated 20.02.2008
though the entry does not reflect the cheque number.
Likewise, the share amount of compensation was paid
to Paras Ram through cheque No. 731667 dated
03.02.2008
05. The aforesaid payment of shares of compensation
amount of Paras Ram and Tej Ram were received in
acknowledgement by Paras Ram, Subash Chander
and Som Dutt by subscribing their respective
signatures in the column of ‘Payee Signatures’ in the
Apportionment Statement.
WP(C) No. 1736/2023 Page 2 of 8
##PAGE3##06. Payment of Rs. 15,70,133/- to Badri Nath-petitioner
No. 1 is said to have been advanced by cheque No.
731666 dated 03.02.2008 by having the signature of
the petitioner No. 1-Badri Nath in the column of
‘Payee Signatures’. There is no reference of the
receipt of compensation by the petitioner No. 1-Badri
Nath being under Protest.
07. The aforesaid payments to the petitioner No. 1-Badri
Nath, Tej Ram and Paras Ram was of 80 per cent
amount of compensation assessed for 32 kanals of
land as per their share-wise entitlement.
08. For the remainder 20% compensation share, the same
came to take place in favour of Subash Chander and
Som Dutt, two sons of Tej Ram on 01.08.2013 by
debit of Rs. 1,96,266/- each from revenue deposit
account No. 8443 to the respective account numbers
of said two persons maintained in the J&K Bank,
Rajouri.
09. Bank account of Mr. Subash Chander is 12881
whereas of Mr. Som Dutt is 12882
10. The payment of remainder of 20% compensation of
Rs. 3,92,533/- came to take place in favour of Paras
Ram by amount transferred to his bank account No.
10792
WP(C) No. 1736/2023 Page 3 of 8
##PAGE4##11. With respect to the aforesaid payment of 20 per cent
compensation, Subash Chander and Som Dutt as well
as Paras Ram have duly appended their signatures in
the ‘Payee Signature’ column of the Apportionment
Statement.
12. The petitioner No. 1-Badri Nath did not volunteer
himself to approach the Collector Land Acquisition
concerned for seeking release of his 20% remainder
compensation amount of Rs. 3,92,533/-, as such, the
same remained lying with the Collector Land
Acquisition and the said situation is obtaining as on
date.
13. About the manner of filing of the writ petition, this
Court, in its order dated 02.07.2025, has already
adverted to the aforesaid aspect.
14. This Court, in its order dated 14.11.2025, has
expressly observed in para-12 that the petitioner No.
2-Lt. Col. Yesh Paul Sharma-(re