HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
SMART EDGE TECHNO TH.ITS PROPRIETOR – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.COMMR/SECTY (TOURISM) AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP(C) 3212 / 2025
##PAGE1##
P age | 1
S. No.130
Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP (C) No. 3212/2025
CM No. 8642/2025, 8804/2025
Smart Edge Techno
House No. 2, Welcome Lane,
Water Reservoir Road,
Brane Nishat, Srinagar
Through its Proprietor
Faisal Shahdad
Aged about 33 years
S/o Mohammad Iqbal Shahdad
R/o Brane, Nishat, Srinagar.
… Petitioner
Through: Ms. Syed Ainain Qadiri, Advocate.
V
1. Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir through
Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Tourism
Department, J&K Government, Civil Secretariat,
Srinagar/Jammu;
2. Managing Director,
Tourism Development Corporation,
Jammu & Kashmir Government,
Srinagar/Jammu;
3. General Manager (Operations),
Tourism Development Corporation,
Srinagar;
4. Chief Accounts Officer/Financial Advisor,
Tourism Development Corporation,
J&K Government, Srinagar/Jammu.
… Respondents
Through: Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Dar, GA.
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R
24.12.2025
1. In this Petition, filed under Article 226, the petitioner seeks the
following reliefs:
“By a writ of Mandamus
a) The Respondents be directed to release the
due/admitted balance amount of Rs.12,41,500/- (Twelve
Lakhs Forty One Thousand and Five Hundred) in favour
WP (C) No. 3212/2025, CM No. 8642/2025, CM No. 8804/2025
##PAGE2##P age | 2
of the petitioner for the work order supplied by him
alongwith 18% interest from the date the same has been
withheld by the Respondent-Corporation.
b) The Respondents be burdened with exemplary costs
and damages of Rupees five lakhs for the harassment,
agony, loss and injury suffered by the petitioner for the
inaction of the Respondents for withholding the balance
payment unnecessarily or at least they may be directed to
pay the interest amount paid by the petitioner from the
date the payment has been stopped by the respondents.”
2. The background facts enumerated in the petition, under the shade
and cover of which the aforesaid relief is being claimed, are that the
Jammu & Kashmir Tourism Department through the Managing
Director, Tourism Development Corporation, TRC, Srinagar, placed
supply orders upon the petitioner through Government-e-Marketplace
(GeM) and the petitioner claims to have supplied one Audio System
with MIC and Speakers, 28 LG Hot and Cold AC, 4 Gas Pillar Heater,
1 LED 75 inch, 2 LED 55 inch, 1 Outdoor Display, 1 Conference Table
with Chairs, supplied in pursuance of supply order no. GEMC-
511687741116675 dated 17.03.2023, and 2 HP Intel Core i5 All in One
PC with 23.8 Inch Display Windows 11 supplied under a separate
supply order, viz., Order no. GEMC-511687753811414 dated
04.04.2024 for an amount of Rs.39,85,000/- and Rs.1,58,000/-
respectively, totaling Rs.41,43,000/- as per approved rates,
specifications, terms and conditions. It is stated that against the said
outstanding amount, the respondents have released only Rs.27,43,500/-
instead of Rs.41,43,000/- and withheld the balance amount of
Rs.12,41,500/- which has not been released to the petitioner,
compelling him to knock the portals of this Court by way of the instant
writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Government
of India has enjoined upon all the Government Departments in all the
States, which includes the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir to
make purchases through online mechanism viz. GeM, and it is in
compliance thereof that Respondent-Corporation issued the supply
WP (C) No. 3212/2025, CM No. 8642/2025, CM No. 8804/2025
##PAGE3##P age | 3
orders through GeM in favour of the petitioner in the years 2023 and
2024, however, the outstanding payment has yet to be cleared by the
respondents. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the
petitioner is being unnecessarily made to run from pillar to post under
the garb of bureaucratic wranglings.
4. Ms. Syed Ainain Qadiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, to
cement her case set up in the instant writ petition, would submit that
since the work/supplies carried out by the petitioner has been
advantageously utilized by the respondents, therefore, the reten
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.