HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD LATEEF SALMAN – Appellant
Versus
SURJEET SINGH – Respondent
CrlA(AS) 17 / 2025
##PAGE1##
Serial No. 23
Reg Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CrlM(646/2025) IN
CrlA(AS) 17/2025.
MOHAMMAD LATEEF SALMAN(SENIOR CITIZEN).
…Appellant (s)
Through: Mr. Badrul Duja, Advocate.
VERSUS
SURJEET SINGH.
Through: Mr. Rabinder Singh, Advocate.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
24-12-2025
CrlM No. 646/2025
01. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking leave
to file the appeal against Order dated 17th of March, 2025, passed by the learned
Trial Magistrate.
02. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and
the applicant/appellant is permitted to filed the appeal against Order dated 17th of
March, 2025 passed by the Trial Magistrate.
03. The application stands disposed of.
CrlA (AS) No. 17/2025
01. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused record of the trial
court.
02. In the appeal, it has been submitted that on the date on which the
impugned order dismissing the complaint of the complainant filed under
CrlA (AS) 17/2025 Page 1 of 4
##PAGE2##Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was passed, the counsel
appearing for the complainant had to travel to Delhi on account of a medical
exigency and, therefore, could not appear before the learned trial Court. In order
to substantiate this assertion, the appellant has placed on record copies of the air
tickets of his counsel along with the relevant medical record.
03. Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC) provides
the procedure to be adopted by the Magistrate in the event of non-appearance or
death of the complainant. It reads as under:-
256. Non-appearance or death of complainant.(1) If
thesummons has been issued on complaint, and on the day
appointed for the appearance of the accused, or any day
subsequent thereto to which the hearing may be adjourned, the
complainant does not appear, the Magistrate shall,
notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, acquit the
accused, unless for some reason he thinks it proper to adjourn
the hearing of the case to some other day:
Provided that where the complainant is represented by a
pleader or by the officer conducting the prosecution or where
the Magistrate is of opinion that the personal attendance of the
complainant is not necessary, the Magistrate may dispense
with his attendance and proceed with the case.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall, so far as may
be, apply also to cases where the non-appearance of the
.
complainant is due to his death
04. A plaint reading of the aforesaid provision reveals that if the
complainant does not appear, the Magistrate is empowered to acquit the accused,
unless, for reasons to be recordedhe thinks it proper to adjourn the hearing of the
case to another date. Proviso to sub-section (1) lays down that if the complainant
is represented by a pleader or by the officer conducting the prosecution, or
where the Magistrate is of the opinion that the personal attendance of the
complainant is not necessary, the Magistrate has the discretion to dispense with
such attendance and proceed with the case. Thus, there are three eventualities in
CrlA (AS) 17/2025 Page 2 of 4
##PAGE3##which the learned Trial Magistrate has the discretion to dispense with the
personal appearance of the complainant. One, if the complainant is represented
by his counsel two if he is represented by the officer conducting the prosecution
and third eventuality is if the personal attendance of the complainant is not
necessary.
05. Coming to the facts of the present case, a perusal of the trial court
record reveals that cognizance of the offence was taken and process was issued
against the respondent-accused vide order dated 07.12.2023, and the matter was
adjourned to 10.02.2024. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned on a couple of
dates and, on 16.07.2024, the accused entered appearance before the learned
Trial Magistrate. He furnished personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of
the learned Trial Magistrate, and the matter was adjourned to 05.09.2024 for
recording t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.