HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
OWAIS MANZOOR GANIE – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME) – Respondent
HCP 166 / 2025
##PAGE1##
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
…
HCP No. 166/2025
Reserved on: 04.12.2025
Pronounced on: 19.12.2025
Uploaded on : 20.12.2025
Owais Manzoor Ganie, Aged 19 Years, S/o Manzoor Ahmad Ganie R/o
Hermain Shopian, District Shopian through his father
……. Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Wajid Mohammad Haseeb, Advocates
Versus
1. Union Territory of J&K through Pr incipal Secretary, Home Department ,
J&K Govt. Civil Sectt. Srinagar/Jammu
2. District Magistrate, Shopian
3. Sr. Superintendent of Police Shopian.
.…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy AG
CORAM
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
JUDGEMENT
1. Through the medium of this petition, Order no. 05/DMS/PSA of 2025
dated 29.04.2025 (impugned detention order) passed by District Magistrate,
Shopinan (for short „detailing authority‟) whereby detenu, namely, Owais
Manzoor Ganie, S/o Manzoor Ahmad Ganie R/o Hermain Shopian, District
Shopian has been placed under preventive detention with a view to prevent him
from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State, is sought to be
quashed and the detenu set at liberty on the grounds made mention of therein.
2. Respondents have filed reply affidavit, insisting therein that the activities
indulged in by detenu are highly prejudicial to the security of the UT and,
therefore, his remaining at large is a threat to the security of UT of J&K. The
activities narrated in the grounds of detention have been reiterated in the reply
affidavit filed by respondents. The factual averments that detenu was not supplied
with relevant material relied upon in the grounds of detention have been refuted. It
is insisted that all the relevant material, which has been relied upon by the
detaining authority, was provided to the detenu at the time of execution of warrant.
3. I have heard learned counsel for parties. I have perused the detention record
produced by learned counsel for respondents and considered the matter.
1
HCP No. 166/2025
##PAGE2##4. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the detenu
was arrested in the year 2022 and taken into Police Station, Shopian where he was
detained illegally and thereafter implicated in a case FIR No. 214/2022 when he
was a juvenile, as such, the detenu was produced before the Juvenile Board
which after subjecting him to enquiry and assessment admitted him to bail in the
month of January, 2023. The detenu was again arrested in the month of April,
2025 and was taken into Police Station, Shopian wherefrom he was shifted to
Central Jail, Koth-bhalwal, Jammu to be detained in terms of impugned detention
order. It is further stated that the detaining authority, in the grounds of detention,
has not shown its awareness about the bail granted in 2023 nor has challenged the
same in the higher forum, inasmuch as FIR No.214/2022 has been taken into
account by detaining authority while passing order impugned, unmindful of the
fact that detenu has been bailed out in the said FIR in which he was also a
juvenile and there have been no further activities alleged against detenu.
Resultantly, impugned order of detention is liable to be quashed.
5. The law on the subject is settled. If detaining authority is apprehensive
that in case detenu is released on bail he may again carry on his criminal
activities, then in such situation, the authority should oppose the bail
application and, in the event, bail is granted, the authority should challenge
such a bail order in the higher forum and that merely on the ground that an
accused in detention is likely to get bail, an order of preventive detention
should not ordinarily be passed. Para 24 of judgment passed in Sama Aruna v.
State of Telangana and another, AIR 2017 SC 2662, reads as under:
“24. There is another reason why the detention order is unjustified. It was
passed when the accused was in jail in Crime No.221 of 2016. His
custody in jail for the said offence was converted into custody under the
impugned detention order. The incident involved in this offence is
sometime in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.