HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
DHARMARTH TRUST J AND K – Appellant
Versus
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR. – Respondent
OWP 796 / 2005
##PAGE1##
Serial No.2
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
OWP No. 796/2005
IA No. 1085/2005
IA No. 712/2008
CM No. 5045/2023 Reserved on: 04.12.2025
Pronounced on: 19.12 .2025
Uploaded on: 19.12.2025
Whether the operative part or
-
full judgment is pronounced Full Judgment
Dharmarth Trust J&K …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ashwani Thakur, Advocate.
Vs
.…. Respondent(s)
Industrial Tribunal & Anr.
Through: Ex parte.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER
1. The petitioner, through the medium of this petition, under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeks quashment of order dated 09.09.2003 of the Industrial
Tribunal, Jammu, whereby an award was passed in favour of the respondent No.2
namely Chand Ram, on a reference made to it by the Government of Jammu and
Kashmir, vide SRO 13 dated 21.01.2003.
2. By virtue of the impugned order, the Tribunal held the termination of the
services of the respondent no.2-Chand Ram illegal and quashed the termination
order. The Tribunal also held the respondent no.2 to be in continuous service of the
petitioner-Trust and entitled to receive back-wages to the extent of 50% from the
date of his termination till the passing of the award, in favour of the respondent
no.2.
3. Aggrieved of the impugned order, the petitioner has assailed the said award
before this court on various grounds, inter alia, that the respondent no.2 was not a
##PAGE2##2
workman as defined under Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act as the
provisions of the Act are not applicable to the petitioner Trust because it does not
fall within the definition of ‘Industry’ as contained in Section 2(j) of the Act.
4. Impugned award has been challenged on the grounds that the award of the
Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court has been passed without jurisdiction and is based
on misconception of law on the counts, firstly, that Dharmarath Trust is not an
industry within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Tribunal Act, 1947;
secondly, Section 25-F of the Act has no application at all and thirdly,
non-compliance of the principles of fundamental judicial procedure-misconception
as to the provisions under Section 36 of the Act.
5. This court vide order dated 23.01.2006, while issuing notice to the
respondents, stayed the impugned order.
6. Pursuant to notice, the respondent no.2 filed objections asserting therein that
vide impugned order, the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court had answered the
reference made by the Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir in terms of SRO 13 dated
20.01.2003. The award has been passed in ex parte as the respondent-petitioner
herein had not contested the same; that it is settled that once a reference is made by
the Govt then the same is required to be answered by the Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court and had the petitioner any grievance against the reference of
the matter to the Industrial Tribunal, it was at liberty to challenge the reference
order made in terms of SRO 13 in the year 2003 itself and this omission on their
part impliedly admitted the legal position which is now disputed; that the writ
petition is hit by doctrine of delay and laches as the impugned award passed in the
year 2003 was challenged in the year 2005 after a delay of more than two years;
that the petitioner-Trust is not a religious and charitable institution but it carried on
multifarious activities and is also involved in the business and trade and comes
within the definition of ‘industry’ as defined in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947;
##PAGE3##3
that the trust-Petitioner owns business markets like Karan Market which has been
carved out by cutting a part of Raghunath Temple and also has hotels like Ranbir
Yatri Hotel at Indira Chowk which has been given to the private persons on
contractual basis and was used as a business establishment of Dharmarth Trust.
Similarly, the Trust owns so many shops, business establishment which have been
given on rent basis and that the petitioner Trust earns profit out of it, thus leaving
the Trust not only as religious and s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.