Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT
A. K. Sahu, J
Tanseem Ahmad Sheikh Alias Tanveer Ahmad v. Union Territory of J and K
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the judgment in a habeas corpus petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeal based on improper consideration of representation and illegal detention. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. parties' arguments presented regarding the legality of detention. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. consideration of the record supporting the judgment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. grounds of detention based on previous events and circumstances. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 6. constitutional protections under article 22(5) for detainees. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 7. final decision resulting in the quashing of the detention order. (Para 20 , 21) |
1. The judgment and order dated 15.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Bench ('the impugned judgment' for short) in WP(Crl) No. 239/2023(AIROnLine 2024 J&K 258), is under challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant, whereby the Habeas Corpus Petition, filed by the appellant, was dismissed with the following observations: -
"...Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the representation made by him to the Home Department has not been processed and considered by the concerned authorities and as such valuable right of the petitioner being considered for release on the representation made by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
