Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT
Sanjeev Kumar, J
Imran Khan v. Union Territory of J and K
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge under article 226 (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's allegations regarding criminality (Para 4 , 9) |
| 3. procedural requirements for history sheet (Para 10 , 14) |
| 4. court's reliance on procedural compliance to ensure individual rights (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's final ruling in favor of the petitioner (Para 21 , 22) |
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Art.226 of the Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Certiorari, to quash the entry of his name from Surveillance Register No. 10 recorded by the respondents and history sheet opened in the name of the petitioner.
2. With a view to understand the background in the light of which the present controversy has arisen, it is deemed appropriate to narrate some of the material facts in brief:
02.1 That an Arms Licence No. DMJ / 2006-07/95 dated 05.02.2007 was issued in favour of the petitioner by the concerned authorities and that because of the peculiar situation in the UT of J and K, the petitioner along with others having licenced weapons was directed to deposit his weapon, in compliance whereof, the petitioner deposited his weapon with Respondent No. 3;
02.2 That after some time, h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
