SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 39

ABDUL GANI NAIK – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE AND OTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['M A QAYOOM', 'AZHAR-UL-AMIN', '', 'M A RATHORE', 'N H SHAH', 'G A LONE']

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT SRINAGAR

OWP No.1302/2013

Date of Decision: 16.03.2017

Abdul Gani Naik

Vs.

Financial Commissioner (Revenue) & ors.

Coram:-

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, Judge

Appearing counsel:-

For the Petitioner(s): Mr. M. A. Qayoom.

For the Respondent(s):

Mr. M. A. Rathore, AAG-for R1 to

R6.

Mr. Azhar-ul-Amin-for R7 to R12.

None for R-13.

i)

Whether to be reported

in Digest/Journal:

YES

ii)

Whether to be reported

in Press/Media:

OPTIONAL

1. Petitioner seeks quashment of the orders i.e.

dated 10.02.2006, passed by Settlement

Commissioner in the revision petition titled

“Mushtaq Ahmad Tantray alias Naik Vs. Abdul Gani

Naik & anr”, order dated 21.02.2011 passed by

Financial Commissioner (Revenue), order dated

04.08.2011 passed on mutation No.19432 and order

dated 24.08.2013 passed by Naib Tehsildar,

Nowgam.

2. In essence, dispute amongst the parties

pertains to the estate left behind by one Abdullah

S/o Nabir Naik, who had died issueless. For

appreciating the controversy in its correct

perspective, the backgroundof the case in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top