SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1830

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT
Sanjay Dhar, J.
Anil Kumar Yadav v. Directorate of Enforcement


1. Through the medium of present petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 30.09.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption (CBI), Jammu ('hereinafter referred to as the “Special Judge”) whereby the learned Special Judge has taken cognizance of the offences on a complaint filed by the respondent against the petitioner and the co - accused, whereafter the process has been issued against them.

2. Issue notice of this petition to the respondent. Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned DSGI, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. Heard and considered.

4. The question of law that has been raised in the present petition is as to whether, in a complaint pertaining to an offence committed prior to the coming into force of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “BNSS”), the procedure is to be governed by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “CrPC”) or by the provisions contained in the BNSS.

5. Before answering the aforesaid question, let me give a brief background of the facts that has led to filing of the instant petition. A complaint came to be filed by the respondent against the petitio
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top