SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1846

JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Arun Palli, C. J., *Rajnesh Oswal, J.
Union Territory of J and K v. Arif Aijaz Shahri


1. The respondent came to be detained by the appellant No.2 (for short "the Detaining Authority) in terms of order dated 23.08.2023 by invoking powers in terms of clause (a) of S.8 of the J and K Public Safety Act (for short "the Act"). The order of detention came to be impugned by the respondent through the medium of HCP No.109/2023 on various grounds including that the respondent had submitted the representation dated 04.09.2023 through his wife to appellants No.1 and 2 but the same was not considered. It was also contended by the respondent that the constitutional as well as statutory safeguards as provided under the Constitution of India and the Act respectively were flagrantly violated by the appellants.

2. The appellants, in their reply to the writ petition, filed by the respondents, stated that the respondent has been detained in terms of impugned order issued by the Detaining Authority and all the statutory requirements and constitutional guarantees have been fulfilled and complied with by the Detaining Authority. The grounds of detention, order of detention and the entire material relied upon by the Detaining Authority came to be furnished to the detenue well within the s















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top