HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
YASIN MANZOOR – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT RAJOURI AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP(C) 905 / 2022
##PAGE1##
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No.905/2022
CM No.2732/2022
Date of Order: 28.01.2026
Uploaded on: 29.01.2026
Yasin Manzoor, Age 26 years,
S/O Sh. Manzoor Hussain
R/O Village Khankari,
Tehsil and District Rajouri.
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajaz Chowdhary, Advocate.
Vs
1. UT of J&K through
Commissioner/Secretary to Govt.
Public Works Department,
Civil Secretariat, Jammu.
2. The Rajouri Municipal Council,
through its President.
3. The Rajouri Municipal Council,
through its Executive Officer.
4. The Executive Engineer,
PWD (R&B) Division, Rajouri.
5. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
PWD (R&B) Sub Division South,
Rajouri.
.…. Respondents
Through: Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Assisting Counsel vice
Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
(ORDER)
28.01.2026
1. Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, has sought the
following reliefs:
WP(C) No.905/2022 Page 1 of 5
##PAGE2##i. Commanding and directing the respondent to release
the payment amounting to Rs.14,78,804/- alongwith
interest @ 22% per annum in favour of the petitioner in
view of the communication dated 14.03.2022
forwarded by the respondent no.4, as the petitioner has
already completed the work;
ii. Commanding and directing the respondents to accord
consideration to the representation of the petitioner for
release of amount of Rs. 14,78,804/- along with
interest @ 22 % per annum.
2. The facts as narrated in the petition are briefly stated as under:
Pursuant to Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) No.122 of 2021-22 dated
29.12.2021, the petitioner participated in the tendering process for construction of
Cafeteria and Passenger Shed near Salani Bridge, Rajouri, wherein he was
declared as successful bidder and was allotted the aforesaid work for an amount
of ₹ 27,78,804/- vide allotment order No.EER/R&B/6/2021-22/22270-75 dated
29.01.2022. On that count, an agreement bearing No.297/OW dated 15.02.2022
was executed between the petitioner and respondent No.4 i.e., Executive
Engineer, PW(R&B) Department, Division Rajouri, and thereafter, the petitioner
carried out the work in order to complete the same and respondents have released
some amount in favour of the petitioner; on directions of District Administration,
Rajouri, the under construction structure was dismantled, resulting loss of
material to the petitioner, approximately, amounting to rupees six to seven lakhs.
On being denied the said amount, the petitioner approached respondent No.5-
WP(C) No.905/2022 Page 2 of 5
##PAGE3##Assistant Executive Engineer, PW(R&B) Department, Sub Division South,
Rajouri; and Junior Engineer concerned prepared the bill amounting to ₹
7,85,776/-, however, the said amount has not been released so far. Vide
communication No.26106-07 dated 14.03.2022, the Executive Engineer,
PW(R&B) Department Division Rajouri submitted the bill for an amount of
₹7,85,776/- to respondent No.3-Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Rajouri,
however, the admitted amount has not been released in favour of the petitioner.
Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 22.03.2022
before the respondents for release of the amount, and inaction on part of the
respondents for release the amount in question, forced the petitioner to knock
portals of this Court by way of present petition for redressal of his grievance.
3. Mr. Ajaz Chowdhary, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the respondents have admitted the work executed by the petitioner, but are
shuttling the onus among them, thereby, denying the due payment to the
petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5 that it is the responsibility of the respondent Nos. 2&3,
the indenting department to liquidate the liability.
5. On notice, resisting the petition, the respondent Nos. 1, 4 & 5
[PW(R&B) Department of Union Territory of J&K] have filed their objections
wherein it is contended that an amount of ₹ 8,34,000/- has been paid to the
WP(C) No.905/2022 Page 3 of 5
##PAGE4##petitioner and another bill
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.