SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 408

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR


Reserved on: 15.04.2026

Pronounced on: 28.04.2026

Uploaded on: 29.04.2026

Whether Full Judgment or Operative Has Been pronounced: Full


WP(C) 710/2024 CM(1896/2024) CM(1897/2024) CM(5082/2024) CM(6667/2025).


Inhabitants Of Village Pariswani Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla Through:

1. Abdul Rehman Malik (Aged 64 Years Approx.)

S/O Abdul Raheem Malik

R/O Village Pariswani

Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla.

2. Abdul Rashid Malik (Aged 60 Years Approx.)

S/O Ghulam Mohammad Malik

R/O Village Pariswani

Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla.

3. Ghulam Mohi-Ud-Din Malik (Aged 63 Years Approx.)

S/O Fathe Mohammad Malik

R/O Village Pariswani Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla.

4. Shabir Ahmad Dar (Aged 43 Years Approx.)

S/O Abdul Gani Dar.

R/O Village Pariswani Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla.

5. Bashir Ahmad Malik (Aged 37 Years Approx.)

S/O Ghulam Mohammad Malik

R/O Village Pariswani Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla.

6. Ghulam Mohammad Malik (Aged 55 Years Aprox.)

S/O Fathe Mohammad Malik

R/O Village Pariswani Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla.

.........Petitioner(s)


Through:

Mr. Gulzar Ahmad Sopori, Adv.

Versus

1. UT Of J&K Through Commissioner Secretary To Revenue Department Government Of Jammu And Kashmir At Civil Secretariat Srinagar/Jammu.

2. Commissioner Secretary to Department Of Geology And Mining (Industries And Commerce) At Civil Secretariat Srinagar/Jammu.

3. Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir At Srinagar.

4. Director Geology and Mining of Kashmir Range At Srinagar.

5. Deputy Commissioner Baramulla.

6. District Mining Officer Department of Geology And Mining (Industries And Commerce At Baramulla).

7. Sdm (Sub Divisional Magistrate) Zone Tangmarg District Baramulla.

8. Sdpo (Sub Divisional Police Officer) Tangmarg. District Baramulla.

9. Tehsildar Kawarhama District Baramulla.

10. SHO Police Station Kunzar District Baramulla.

........Respondent(s)

Through:

Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG

Mr. Illyas Nazir Laway, GA


CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner through the medium of the instant petition has sought the following relief(s):

I) “By issuance of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate relief thereby directing upon the respondents not to restrain, not to cause any sort of harassment to the inhabitants while earning their livelihood by extracting sand and bolders/small stones from their property land and from the Arrah/Nallah situated in the Village Pariswani Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla.

II) By issuance of appropriate writs or appropriate orders thereby commanding upon the respondents to take a decision with regarding to depositing of royalty on behalf of the inhabitants for the land notified as Arrah/Nallah situated in Village Pariswani Tehsil Kawarhama District Baramulla so as to enable the inhabitants to utilize the same for their livelihood purposes to sustain and maintain their survival and feed their families.

III) By issuance of appropriate writ or appropriate order thereby direction upon the respondents not to cause unnecessary restrains to the inhabitants while utilizing their land and also while working in the said Arrah/Nallah for their livelihood purposes and allow the inhabitants to earn their livelihood in accordance with the law”.

Brief Facts:

2. The brief facts of the case are that petitioners, who are residents of village Pariswani, have filed the instant petition on behalf of the inhabitants of the said village, aggrieved of the action on the part of the respondents in not permitting the petitioners and other inhabitants to utilize their proprietary land by extracting sand, crusher material and bajri therefrom, particularly after the said land had been converted into a Nallah. It is further averred that the petitioners and other inhabitants are also not being permitted to extract stones and sand from the Nallah passing through the village, from which they have been earning their livelihood for centuries, despite the fact that the petitioners have been depositing royalty with the Government.

Submissions on Behalf of Petitioners:

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Gulzar Ahmad Sopori, submits that the Government without issuance of any notification is not accepting royalty from the inhabitants for extracting the said sand/small stones, which has caused hardships and starvation to the hundreds of families. It is contended that the main survival of the inhabitants is on the said extraction, and till 2021, the petitioners were regularly depositing royalty before the concerned department, pursuant to which they were permitted by the Government to extract sand and small stones from the Nallah in question. The material so extracted was being utilized for construction of buildings, houses and roads. According to the petitioners, the action of the respondents in not accepting the royalty and in restraining the inhabitants from carrying on their livelihood is illegal, arbitrary and unjustified.

4. It is further submitted that petitioners have been earning their livelihood by extracting sand and stones from the Nallah, i.e., Block Nos. 10, 11 and 12, upon payment of the requisite royalty, which was being regularly deposited earlier. It is further averred that the said Nallah passes through the proprietary land of the petitioners and that a portion of such proprietary land has since merged into the Nallah. The petitioners submit that, having no other regular source of income, they have been engaged in the extraction of sand and stones from the said Nallah since time immemorial for their sustenance.

5. Learned counsel for petitioners contended that they have been subjected to victimization, inasmuch as their vehicles have been seized and fines have been imposed by the respondents, and they are not being permitted to extract sand and stones despite the fact that they had been depositing royalty with the respondents. The petitioners, in support of their case, have relied upon Article 19 of the Constitution of India, contending

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top