SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 453

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU


2026:JKLHC-JMU:991


WP(C) No. 839/2022

CM No. 2528/2022


1. Sansar Chand S/O Anant Ram

2. Tej Ram S/O Sarvan Thakur

3. Mohd. Rafiq Khan S/O Mohd Shafi Khan

4. Mohd Fareed Khan S/O Mohd Shafi Khan

5. Mohd Ashraf Khan S/O Mohd Sikander Khan

6. Jamal Din S/O Amkala

7. Mohd Jaffer S/O Amkala

8. Mohd Farooq S/O Mohd Sikander Khan

9. Ghulam Haider Khan S/O Mohd Abdullah

10. Mohd Amin S/O Saif Din

11. Mahmdoo S/O Lasu Wani

12. Abdullah S/O Razaq Kachar

13. Mohd Qasim S/O Gh. Mohd Mir

All residents of Village Mavolkote,

Tehsil Gool, District Ramban.

....Petitioners

Versus

1. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir

through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt.

Revenue Department, Civil Secretariat,

Jammu.

2. Deputy Commissioner, Ramban.

3. Collector Land Acquisition

(SDM) Gool

District Ramban.

4. Executive Engineer, PWD Division, Ramban.

....Respondent(s)


Through :- Mr. Nadeem Bhat, Adv. (For Petitioners)

Through :- Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG (For Respondents)


CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE


Reserved on:- 24.03.2026

Pronounced on:08.04.2026

Uploaded on:- 08.04.2026

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioners, through the medium of this petition, inter alia, have prayed for the following reliefs:

(i) Writ of certiorari:- Quashing the final award bearing No.SDM/G/PWD/1475-81 dated 03.07.2020 passed by the respondent No.3 of the land acquired for the construction of Sangaldan Kanthan road in Village Movalkote under NABARD and quashing the Notification u/s 4(1) No.SDM/G/PWD/270-80 dated 07.03.2017 and 9, 9-A of J&K Land Acquisition Act 1990 and Notification No.6 and 7 of land J&K Acquisition Act bearing no. DC/LA/RBN/17/46-47 dated 15.06.2017;

(ii) Writ of Certiorari:- Quashing the land acquisition proceedings conducted by the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 of the land measuring 45 kanal 7 marlas situated at Village Movolkote Tehsil Gool District Ramban for the construction of road from Sangaldan to Kanthan under PWD being against the Section 11-B & Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act;

(iii) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings of the land measuring 45 kanals 7 marlas situated at Village Movolkote Tehsil Gool District Ramban which has been acquired for construction of road from Sangaldan Kanthan road for public purpose because the final award has been passed in violation of Section 11-B of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990;

(iv) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents to initiate the fresh acquisition under Right to Fair Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2013 and pay the compensation to the petitioners with interest as per the Fair Compensation Act; and

(v) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to pay the compensation of Fruit bearing and non fruit bearing trees assessed by the authorities in the year 2013 dated 07.01.2013 and 24.01.2013.

(vi) To pass such other orders or directions which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of case.”

2. Factual background as pleaded is that:-

(I) The government of J&K decided to construct a road from Sangaldan-Kanthan Bye pass through Village Movalkote, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban over the private land, houses and shops owned and possessed by different persons including the petitioners and for this purpose, land was acquired by the respondents 2 and 3 under the Land Acquisition Act but without paying any compensation to the petitioners; that aggrieved thereof, the petitioners approached this court in the year 2011 as also in 2014 by way of filing writ petitions, which were disposed of with direction to the respondents to assess the land of the petitioners and pay compensation accordingly;

(II) That respondents 3 and 4 in the year 2012 initiated the acquisition proceedings and Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was issued on 09.10.2012 but final award was not passed within the stipulated time period; that again in the year 2017, notification U/S 4(1) of the Act was issued but the final award was not passed within a period of two years as required U/S 11-B of the Act and the same was passed on 03.07.2020 i.e. after the lapse of more than two years; that the compensation for the fruit bearing tree was not paid to the petitioners till date; that the respondents have not followed the procedure laid down in Section 4(1) of the Act as the Notifications u/s 4(1) and Sections 6 & 7 of the Act were not published in any newspaper, as such, the whole acquisition proceedings are required to be quashed; that no objections were sought from the land owners including the petitioners as they were not afforded an opportunity of being heard while Notifications U/Ss 9 and 9-A of the Land Acquisition Act were issued on 23.08.2017; that the Collector was duty-bound to pass the final award within a period of two years and the act of the respondents clearly violated the provisions of Land Acquisition Act.

3. (III) Aggrieved of the aforesaid action of the respondents, the petitioners

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top