S.No.154 Supp.Case List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR TrP (C) 4/2026 ASSADULLAH BHAT AND …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).

OTHERS(SENIOR CITIZEN)

Through: Mr. M. Sultan, Advocate Vs.

GUL DAR AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s).

Through:

CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE

ORDER

29.04.2026

1. While the matter was being heard, it has come to the notice of this Court that the petitioners have levelled scandalous and wholly unsubstantiated allegations against the Presiding Officer of the Court of Sub-Judge, Pattan as well as the Principal District Judge, Baramulla, without any proof whatsoever, in paragraph 4 of the petition. For facility of reference, the said paragraph is reproduced as under:

“That the petitioner further entertain suspicious circumstances that the Presiding officer of the court of Sub Judge Pattan is directlyunder theinfluence of Principal District Judge Baramulla, who is hand in glove with one of the defendants and in these circumstances, the plaintiff feels that there may be casualty of justice at the hands of Sub Judge Pattan, who is under direct influence of the Principal District Judge Baramula. Therefore, petitioners feel that the case