SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 600

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
NAZIR AHMAD MIR – Appellant
Versus
ISHFAQ AHMAD MIR – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JAMMU &KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Reserved on: 18.04.2026 Pronounced on: 30.04.2026 Uploaded on: 30 .04.2026 Whether the operative part or full judgment is pronounced:

Full RFA No.60/2024 NAZIR AHMAD MIR & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT Through: - Mr. Manzoor Ahmad Dar, Advocate, with Mr. Javaid Ahmad, Advocate.

Mr. Luqman Ahmad Dar, Advocate.

Vs.

ISHFAQ AHMAD MIR & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S)

Through: - Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Firdous Ahmad, Advocate Ms. Gousia Jan, Advocate.

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

JUDGMENT

1) The appellants have challenged order/judgment dated 31-07-2024 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Srinagar (hereinafter referred to as the “trial court”), whereby application of respondent No.1/defendant No.1 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code has been allowed and the plaint filed by the appellants/plaintiffs before the trial court has been rejected.

2) The facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellants filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the respondents before the learned trial court. In the plaint it was alleged there that the predecessor-in-interest of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top