SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 604

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Tabassum Qadir Parray – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR SWP No. 1577/2018 Reserved on: 20.04.2026 Pronounced on: 06.05.2026 Uploaded on:06 .05.2026 Whether the operative part or full judgment is pronounced: Full

1.Tabassum Qadir Parray D/O Sh. Abdul Qadir Parray

2. Meyank Gupta son of Sh. Lalit Gupta

3.Sajad ur Rehman son of Abdul Rahim Dar

4. Altaf Hussain Khan son of Nazir Mohd Khan Petitioners Through: - Mr. Salih Pirzada Advocate vs High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and another …Respondent(s)

Through: -Mr. M.I.Qadiri Advocate for R-1 Mr. Waseem Gul G.A. for R-2 Mr. Showkat Ali Khan Advocate for R-3 to 17 Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah G.A. for R-18 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR JUDGE

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Kumar, J

1 The idiom “to have your cake and eat it too” completely fits in the controversy raised and the relief prayed for in this petition.

2. In this petition, the petitioners have, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:

(i) writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari to quash the seniority list of Munsiffs issued by the High Court vide order No. 728 dated 19.11.2011 wherein the petitioners have been shown at S. Nos. 31, 32, 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top