SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 609

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
ROUF AHMAD MIR & OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
MST ADFARA REHMAN – Respondent


S. No.139 Suppl.1 List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH , AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) No.277/2026 \

ROUF AHMAD MIR & OTHERS …..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr.G.M.Shah, Advocate V/s MST ADFARA REHMAN … ..Respondent(s)

Through: None CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE ORDER

06.05.2026

1. The petitioners through the medium of present petition have challenged order dated 12.11.2025, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ganderbal (hereinafter ‘the Appellate Court’), whereby appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (hereinafter ‘the DV Act’), filed by the respondent against order dated 11.11.2023 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ganderbal (hereinafter ‘the trial Magistrate’) has been allowed and the aforesaid order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has been set aside.

2. It appears that the respondent (hereinafter ‘the aggrieved person’) filed the petition under Section 12 of the DV Act against the petitioners before the learned trial Magistrate. It is pertinent to mention here that petitioner No.1 happens to be the husband of the aggrieved person. In the petition the aggrieved person pleaded that she was married

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top