SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 634

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR


CRM(M) No. 162/2022


Reserved on: 24.04.2026

Pronounced on: 14.05.2026

Uploaded on: 15.05.2026


Operative part or full Judgement: Full


Vishvendra Singh (54 Years)

S/O D.P. Singh

R/O 91, National Park,

Lajpat Nagar-IV,

Delhi-110024 …Petitioner(s)


Through:

M/S Vikas Malik & Mushtaq Ahmad Dar, Advocates


Vs.

1. UT of Jammu and Kashmir,

Through SHO Police Station,

Budgam.

2. WTC Faridabad Infrastructure,

Through Authorized Representative,

M. A. Sayed,

GF-09, Uppal M6 Plaza Jasla,

District Centre Jasla,

New Delhi-110025 ...Respondent(s)


Through:

Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG for R-1; and

None for R-2


CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

01. The petitioner, through the medium of the instant petition, has challenged order dated 1st of November, 2021 passed by the learned Special Mobile Magistrate, Budgam (for short “the Budgam Magistrate”) in a complaint filed by the respondent No.2 herein, under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr PC) directing registration of FIR. Besides, the petitioner also seeks quashing of the FIR No. 327/2021 dated 1st of November, 2021 registered at Police Station, Budgam under Sections 469 and 505 (II) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

02. The petitioner, a resident of Delhi, claims to be one of the several victims of a huge real estate fraud hatched between 2009-2014, wherein several hundred crores of rupees had been siphoned out of a real estate Developer company-AN Buildwell Pvt Ltd (ANB) by one ill-famed builder Ashish Bhalla who used the said diverted funds from ANB to create his own WTC group of companies, as a consequence whereof, multiple FIRs came to be registered, being FIR No. 114/2016, 116/2016 and 64/2016, all investigated by EOW, Delhi; that the respondent No.2 herein is one of the companies of WTC Group owned by the aforesaid notorious builder Ashish Bhalla, which has recently started selling residential plots over agricultural land in Faridabad and Haryana without even obtaining mandatory DTCP License and RERA Registration, consequent to which authorities have already begun action against it on the complaint filed by Petitioner herein.

03. Petitioner alleges that exasperated by the petitioner's Whistleblow of the above mentioned Scam and as a counter blast to Petitioner's police Complaint filed at Delhi, the respondent No. 2 hatched a conspiracy to neutralize the petitioner and, hence, vide Email dated 6th of September, 2021, the respondent placed a brochure on petitioner's email and, thereafter, instituted Complaint No. 775/2021 u/s 200 Cr. P.C. on 7th of October, 2021 at Srinagar and obtained a summoning order dated 7th of October, 2021 from the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM, Srinagar against the Petitioner herein; that, after obtaining above referred summoning order dated 7th of October, 2021 at Srinagar, the respondent No. 2 concealing that he had also approached the Court at Srinagar and moved U/s 156(3) Cr PC, the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Budgam and obtained another order dated 1st of November, 2021 for registration of FIR at Police Station, Budgam based on same set of facts on which the above summoning order dated 7th of October, 2021 had been issued by the learned CJM, Srinagar.

04. Petitioner next pleaded that the respondent No. 2 not only used same facts to pursue the above referred two parallel criminal proceedings at Srinagar and Budgam, but had also used the same facts to file third criminal proceeding in New Delhi (through its sister concern u/s 156(3) Cr PC at Saket Court, New Delhi, on 6th of December, 2021; that the respondent No.2 concealed from the Courts at Delhi, Budgam and Srinagar about the factum of same set of facts/ allegations/ incidents being used to pursue three parallel criminal cases against the petitioner herein; that around 1st of November, 2021, petitioner herein received summons from the Court of learned CJM, Srinagar in respect of Complaint No. 775/2021; that the petitioner was shocked to see that despite both sides being based in Delhi, the jurisdiction of the Court at Srinagar had been maliciously selected by respondent No. 2; that, thereafter, the petitioner, barely being able to assess the situation, approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of filing Transfer Petition bearing TP (Crl) No. 49/2022 which is pending adjudication before the Hon'ble Supreme Court at the time of filing the present petition; that the Petitioner in exercise of his legal remedies against the summoning order as also filed Criminal Revision Petition before the Hon'ble Sessions Court at Srinagar against the order of summoning, which was disposed of vide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top