HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
SHAKEEL AHMAD MAGLO – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF J AND K AND ANR. (HOME) – Respondent
HCP 221 / 2025
##PAGE1##
P age | 1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
HCP No. 221/2025
Reserved on: 07.05.2026
Pronounced on: 13.05.2026
Uploaded on: 14.05.2026
Whether the operative part or full
judgment is pronounced- Full
Shakeel Ahmad Maglo
S/O Abdul Gani Maglo,
R/O Batamurran Wanpora,
Keller, District Shopian.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Adv. Zahid Hussain Dar.
Vs.
1. Union Territory of J&K through
Principal Secretary to Govt.,
Home Department,
Civil Sectt. Srinagar.
2. District Magistrate, Shopian.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Dy.AG Bikramdeep Singh.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A.CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
JUDGMENT
1. By way of the present Habeas Corpus Petition, the petitioner seeks
quashment of Detention Order No. 07/DMS/PSA of 2025 dated
01.05.2025 passed by respondent No. 2-District Magistrate Shopian,
under the provisions of the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act,
1978, whereby the detenue has been placed under preventive
##PAGE2##P age | 2
detention to deter him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the
‘security of UT of J&K’.
2. On perusal of the grounds of detention, it transpires that the detenue
was involved in antinational activities, which are highly prejudicial
to the sovereignty of the State and peace of the district; that the
detenue is in contact with active terrorists and is working as an
OGW for them which succinctly described his abnormal behaviour
and prejudicial nature towards peace and stability in the district; that
the detenue was previously involved in case registered as FIR
No.62/2020 under sections 307 IPC, 7/27 IA Act, 16, 18, 19, 20
UL(P)A of Police Station Shopian; that the deneue was released on
bail in the said FIR by the competent court of law; that thereafter the
petitioner was kept under surveillance and the secret information
received from intelligence agencies revealed that the petitioner was
continuously working as OGW of the terrorists; that the activities of
the petitioner were found highly prejudicial to the security of UT of
J&K, as such, in order to prevent him from indulging in similar
activities it has become imperative to detain him under the
provisions of J&K Public Safety Act, 1978.
1. The main grounds urged by learned counsel for the petitioner are
that the allegations forming basis of detention are general, vague and
bereft of material particulars; that the detenue had already been
granted bail by the competent criminal court and the said bail order
was never challenged by the respondents before any superior forum;
that the detaining authority has failed to record any compelling
reason showing that the ordinary law of the land was insufficient to
##PAGE3##P age | 3
deal with the detenue; that the grounds of detention are nothing but a
verbatim reproduction of the police dossier, demonstrating complete
non-application of mind by the detaining authority.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that preventive detention
being an exception to a cherished right to personal liberty guaranteed
under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the procedural
safeguards provided under Article 22(5) of the Constitution and the
Public Safety Act are required to be strictly complied with. It is
argued that the detention order cannot sustain, once the record
demonstrates mechanical exercise of power and absence of genuine
subjective satisfaction.
3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has
supported the detention order and submitted that the activities of the
detenue were prejudicial to the maintenance of security of UT of
J&K and, therefore, the detaining authority was justified in passing
the impugned order.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the detention record
produced by the respondents and considered the same.
5. A perusal of grounds of detention reveals that the allegations leveled
against the detenue except his involvement in case FIR No.62/2020
registered at Police Station Shopian, are couched in general and
vague expressions without specifying precise particulars regarding
dates, places and overt acts attributable to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.