HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
ABDUL GANI MIR – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION PULWAMA AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT) – Respondent
CRM(M) 18 / 2023
##PAGE1##
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 18/2023
CrlM No. 1843/2025
Reserved on: 07.05.2026
Pronounced on: 13.05.2026
Uploaded on: 14.05.2026
Operative part or full Judgement: Full
Abdul Gani Mir, Aged 68 years
S/O Ghulam Mohammad Mir
R/O Urchirsoo, District Pulwama
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Malik Mushtaq & Mr. Younis Ahad, Advocates
Vs.
1. UT of J&K through SHO,
Police Station, Pulwama
2. Tehsildar Pulwama
… .Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Furqan Yaqub, GA & Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
JUDGEMENT
01. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court
under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC)
seeking the quashment of FIR No. 03 of 2023 dated 02.01.2023,
registered at Police Station, Pulwama, for the offences under
Sections 353 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
02. The factual matrix, as pleaded in the petition, is that the
impugned FIR was lodged following a complaint from
respondent no.2-Tehsildar, Pulwama, alleging that on
02.01.2023, the petitioner harassed and criminally intimidated
1
##PAGE2##one Reyaz Ahmad Deedad, Patwari Halqa Gangoo, while he was
discharging his official duties at village Urchirsoo.
03. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner had filed
applications for the preservation of Kahcharia (grazing) land and
the restoration of his ingress and egress; that the Divisional
Commissioner, Kashmir, had issued multiple directions for the
removal of encroachments; that due to the alleged failure of
Respondent No. 2 (Tehsildar) to discharge his duties, the
petitioner filed a complaint before the Divisional Commissioner,
Kashmir. Consequently, on 27.04.2022, Respondent No. 2 was
directed to explain his position within three days. The petitioner
further approached the personal section of the Advisor to the Lt.
Governor, which resulted in a direction dated 27.12.2022,
ordering the Deputy Commissioner, Pulwama, to retrieve state
land and seeking an explanation from Respondent No. 2 for
dereliction of duty. In this background, it is submitted that the
registration of case pursuant to lodging of complaint by the
complainant-Tehsildar against the petitioner can be stated to be
misuse of the legal process, due to his personal vendetta.
04. Aggrieved of the impugned FIR, the petitioner challenges the
same, primarily, on the grounds that the FIR is alleged to be an
abuse of the process of law, as the allegations in the complaint do
not disclose the commission of any cognizable offence; that the
complaint lacks material ingredients as it does not specify any act
of "assault" or "criminal force" and merely reproduces the
statutory language of the IPC sections in verbatim; that the FIR
2
##PAGE3##was lodged maliciously with an ulterior motive for wreaking
vengeance; that the Respondent No. 2, upon learning of the
Advisor’s order seeking his explanation, filed the complaint the
very next day to pressurize the petitioner; that the allegations are
characterized as general, sweeping, inherently improbable, and
unsubstantiated, designed solely to implicate the petitioner in a
baseless legal proceeding.
05. Conversely, the respondents, in their objections and status report,
contended that the petitioner is himself an encroacher on
Shamilat/Kahchari land (Survey No. 1093/818). They submit
that despite notices and the dismissal of his revision petition by
the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, and thereafter upholding
the order by the Joint Financial Commissioner, the petitioner
failed to remove the illegal encroachment. It is stated in the
objections that on 02.01.2023, while the Patwari was conducting
a lawful demarcation of common land, the petitioner allegedly
went "berserk," harassed the official, and threatened him with
dire consequences, if the demarcation is not stopped. The
incident was verified by field reports from the Lumberdar Deh,
the concerned Patwari, and the Naib Tehsildar, Pulwama.
Respondent No. 1 (Police) reported that the scene of the crime
was inspected, a site plan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.