HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
BASHARAT AHMAD BHAT – Appellant
Versus
YASMEEN SIDIQ AND OTHERS – Respondent
CRM(M) 302 / 2026
##PAGE1##
S. No.81
Suppl. List 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
,
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No.302/2026
BASHARAT AHMAD BHAT
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr.Gash Asrar-ul-Haq, Advocate
V/s
YASMEENA SIDIQ AND ORS
… ..Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
12.05.2026
1. The petitioner through the medium of present petition has
challenged order dated 23.04.2026 passed by learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Pulwama, whereby, while admitting the appeal
filed by the respondents against order dated 23.04.2026 passed
by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Pampore in the
proceedings under Section 12/23 of Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act (hereinafter ‘the DV Act’), the order
impugned passed by the learned Magistrate has been stayed.
2. Heard and Considered.
3. It seems that the respondents have filed a petition under
Section 12 of the DV Act before the Court of learned Judicial
Magistrate 1st Class, Pampore (hereinafter ‘the trial Magistrate’)
CRM(M) No.302/2026 1 | Pa ge
##PAGE2##against the petitioner herein. In the said petition, an ex-parte
interim order came to be passed by the learned trial Magistrate
on 23.02.2026, whereby the petitioner was directed to pay an
interim compensation of Rs.18,000/- per month to the
respondents herein and to provide a separate accommodation in
the form of two rooms in the shared house hold.
4. After filing of objections by the petitioner, the application
for grant of interim relief in terms of Section 23 of the DV Act
came to be disposed of by the learned trial Magistrate vide order
dated 23.04.2026. The learned Magistrate modified the interim
ex-parte order dated 23.02.2026 by providing that instead of
residence in the shared house hold, the petitioner herein shall
secure and provide suitable rented accommodation to the
respondents within a reasonable vicinity of the children’s school,
so as to ensure continuity of education.
5. The aforesaid order came to be challenged by the
respondents before the Court of learned Additional Sessions
Judge, Pulwama by way of an appeal under Section 29 of the
DV Act. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, while
entertaining the appeal, issued notice to the petitioner herein and
stayed the order passed by learned trial Magistrate on
23.04.2026 and clarified that the interim arrangement as
reflected in order dated 23.02.2026 shall continue to govern the
parties till further orders.
CRM(M) No.302/2026 2 | Pa ge
##PAGE3##6. The petitioner instead of contesting the appeal before the
learned Additional Sessions Judge has rushed to this Court and
filed the present petition invoking jurisdiction of this Court
under Section 528 of BNSS.
7. It has been contended that the learned Appellate Court has
committed a grave error in reviving interim ex-parte order dated
23.02.2026 passed by learned trial Magistrate, as the same stood
already modified by the learned trial Magistrate after hearing the
parties.
8. The aforesaid contention of the petitioner is misconceived
and flawed, because the learned Appellate Court has, while
entertaining the appeal against the impugned order dated
23.04.2026 passed by the learned trial Magistrate, stayed the said
order, which in effect revives the interim ex-parte order dated
23.02.2026 passed by the learned trial Magistrate. Once the
final order passed by the learned trial Magistrate on 23.04.2026
was stayed by the learned Appellate Court, a cloud is cast on the
said order and it revives the position which was existing prior to
the passing of the said order. This is what has been clarified by
the learned Additional Sessions Judge while passing the
impugned order dated 30.04.2026.
9. Thus no illegality or irregularity has been committed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge while passing the impugned
order. If at all the petitioner has any grievance against the
CRM(M) No.302/2026 3 | Pa ge
##PAGE4##interim order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, the proper course for him is to contest the appeal
on its merits and project all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.