SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 671

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
FAROOQ AHMAD MIR – Appellant
Versus
HABIB UL LLAH BHAT AND OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(2562/2026)

In CM(M) 147/2026 CM(2563/2026)

Reserved on: 5th May, 2026. Pronounced on: 6th May,2026 Uploaded on: 7th May,2026 Whether operative part or full judgment has been pronounced: Full Farooq Ahmad Mir (70 years) …Petitioner(s)

S/o Late Rahim Mir R/o Lalpora, District Kupwara.

Through: Mr. S M. Saleem, Advocate.

Vs.

1. Habib Ul-llah Bhat. ...Respondent(s)

2. Noor-u-Allh Bhat S/o Saif-ul-llah Bhat R/o: TehsIl Lalpora, Lolab District: Kupwara

3. Mushtaq Ahmad Mir S/o: Rahim Mir R/o: Lalpora Lolab, District Kupwara.

Through: CORAM:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.

JUDGMENT

01. The petitioner, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeks setting aside of order dated 28.02.2026 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Kupwara, whereby the appellate Court has dismissed the miscellaneous appeal preferred by the petitioner and upheld the order dated 30.05.2024 passed by the learned Munsiff, Sogam, granting interim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents, which is also impugned in the instant petition.

02. The factual matrix of the case is that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top