SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 757

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Wasim Sadiq Nargal, J
Minor Victim X – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
WP(C) 1016/2026|CM(2659/2026)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Asifa Rashid
For the Respondents: Faheem Nisar Shah, Waseem Gul

The court cannot permit medical termination of pregnancy at an advanced gestational stage if a duly constituted Medical Board concludes that such a procedure poses a serious threat to the life and health of the minor victim, as the right to reproductive choice is not absolute and is subordinate to the right to life.

Headnote:(A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3 - Petitioner sought termination of pregnancy of minor victim (approx. 27 weeks) - Medical Board unequivocally opined that termination at this advanced stage entails serious obstetric risks including hysterectomy, hemorrhage, and threats to life - Court emphasized that while reproductive autonomy is a right, it is not absolute and does not override life-threatening medical risks substantiated by expert opinion - Appellate courts are not to substitute own views for expert medical conclusions - Preservation of life given paramount consideration - (Paras 27, 32, 34, 43).

(B) Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Sections 2(14) and 38 - Court held that protective framework of JJ Act applies to minor victims of sexual assault - Directs authorities to provide free medical care, counseling, and psychosocial support through designated hospital authorities and welfare departments to ensure protection of privacy and dignity of the victim - (Paras 46, 48, 52, 53).

Facts of the case:
A 14-year-old minor victim, who conceived as a result of sexual assault, sought judicial permission for termination of a 27-week pregnancy. Due to the advanced gestational age, the Court constituted a Medical Board which concluded that such a procedure would pose severe risks to the victim's life and health. The Court was asked to weigh the victim's right of reproductive choice against the medical opinion of high-risk outcomes.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that it could not override a clear, expert medical opinion indicating imminent danger to the life of the victim. It emphasized the doctrine of parens patriae and the constitutional mandate to protect the right to life. The Court, therefore, declined the plea for termination but mandated a comprehensive support system for the minor's pre-natal care, delivery, and post-natal rehabilitation.

Issues: Whether medical termination of pregnancy should be permitted at an advanced gestational stage against the categorical report of a Medical Board citing life-threatening complications.

Ratio Decidendi: While article 21 grants reproductive rights, they are not absolute; when a duly constituted Medical Board opines that termination poses a serious threat to the life of the pregnant minor, the court must prioritize the preservation of life over the prayer for termination.

Result: Petition dismissed; specific directions issued for the health, protection, and welfare of the victim and the prospective child.

Table of Content
1. court intervention sought for medical termination of minor rape victim pregnancy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. petitioner argues for reproductive autonomy as part of right to life. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. determination of age and necessity of medical board assessment. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. medical board advice on fatal risks prevents termination order. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
5. judicial restraint regarding expert medical opinions in complex cases. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
6. proactive protection and welfare support mandatory for young victims. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)

CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

21.05.2026

PRAYER:

1. The petitioner through the medium of instant petition has sought the following reliefs from the Court:

“a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction permitting and authorizing immediate Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) of the minor victim in FIR No. 38/2026 registered at Police Station D.H. Pora, District Kulgam, notwithstanding the fact that the gestational age has exceeded the statutory limit prescribed under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971;

b) Direct respondents to constitute/arrange an appropriate Medical Board forthwith for immediate medical examination of the minor victim and for furnishing urgent medical opinion regarding safe termination of pregnancy;

c) Direct the concerned Government Hospital/Medical Board to undertake the termination procedure with utmost urgency, confidentiality and in accordance with law, ensuring complete medical care, counselling and post-procedure assistance to the minor victim;

d) Direct preservation and protection of the identity, dignity, privacy and confidentiality of the minor victim throughout the judicial proceedings, investigation and medical process;

e) Direct that all necessary medical expenses, treatment and post operative care of the minor victim be borne by the State in the interest of justice and welfare of the child;

f) Pass any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”

BRIEF FACTS

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of a minor girl, aged approximately 14 years, who conceived as a direct result of sexual assault and rape. In respect of the said incident, FIR No. 0038/2026 was registered at Police Station D.H. Pora, District Kulgam, under the applicable provisions governing sexual offences. The accused has since been taken into custody and the matter is under investigation.

3. According to the medical examination and ultrasonography report, the gestational age of the pregnancy was approximately 25 weeks and 05 days at the time of filing of the instant petition, thereby exceeding the permissible statutory limit ordinarily prescribed under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The minor was produced before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), Kulgam, which declared her a Child in Need of Care and Protection and recommended urgent legal, medical, and psychological intervention.

4. Pursuant thereto, the CWC approached the Chief Medical Officer, Kulgam. However, vide official communication dated 29.04.2026, the medical authorities informed that termination of pregnancy could not be undertaken without the permission of a competent court, as the gestational period exceeded the statutory limit.

5. In view of the foregoing, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking urgent permission for medical termination of pregnancy under Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER

6. Learned counsel, Ms. Asifa Rashid, appearing on behalf of the minor victim 'X' submits that the petitioner is a minor girl aged about 14 years a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top