SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 23669

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S DHARMA SUGAR INDUSTRIES (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER – Respondent
CA 30/2022



Advocates:
SRI. JAGADEESH GOUD PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR O.L., SRI. DEEPAK, ADVOCATE

The court mandated the State Bank of India to cooperate with the official liquidator for the sale of mortgaged property, emphasizing the importance of timely action and document availability.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 1956 - Winding up proceedings - Official liquidator's request for the State Bank of India to sell mortgaged property of the company in liquidation - State Bank of India failed to act on multiple requests over two decades - Court directed State Bank of India to provide certified copies of documents and cooperate with the official liquidator for the sale of property. (Paras 2, 3, 8, 10)

(B) Property Sale - The bank's responsibility to act on the official liquidator's requests and the consequences of failing to disclose the non-availability of original documents - Court emphasized the need for timely action to prevent encroachment on the property. (Paras 4, 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The official liquidator sought direction for the State Bank of India to sell a mortgaged property, which had been subject to delays and lack of action from the bank despite multiple requests over a long period. Encroachment on the property was reported during an inspection.

Findings of Court:
The State Bank of India is directed to furnish certified copies of the property documents within 45 days and cooperate with the official liquidator for the sale of the property.

Issues: The main issues included the bank's inaction regarding the sale of the property and the lack of original documents necessary for the sale process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the bank's failure to respond to the official liquidator regarding the non-availability of original documents contributed to the delay in the sale, and emphasized the need for the bank to cooperate with the official liquidator.

Result: CA No.30/2022 is partly allowed.

ORDER

1. CA No.30/2022 has been filed seeking for the following reliefs;

    a) To direct the State Bank of India, the secured creditor of the company to take urgent steps to sell the property viz., land measuring 5 acres and 8 guntas situated Near Girisinkoppa Travellers Bunglow, Haveri-Hangal Road, Girisinkoppa, Tq.
    Hangal, Dist. Haveri, as per the orders dated 12.08.1988 in Co.A 261/19987 (Annexure-B) and report.
    b) To pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the Circumstances of the case.

2. The contention of the official liquidator is that Company (in liquidation) - M/s Dharma Sugar Industries Private Limited was ordered to be wound up vide order dated 20.6.1986 in COP No.52/1985 is ceased of certain immovable properties which had apparently been mortgaged in favour of respondent-State Bank of India, Hangal Brach, Haveri District.

3. Despite official liquidator having written several letters from the year 2001 onwards over a period of two decades the respondent-Bank did not take any action to sell the property, recover the monies and make payment of dues to the workers and any other persons who is having pari passu charge. Meetings held with the officials of the Bank also not having evoked any results the aforesaid prayers have been sought for in the present application.

4. This Court had directed an inspection of the property and the status report to be filed, which came to so filed by 20.2.2024. This time stating that on inspection of the property it is found that there is certain encroachment, it is for State Bank of India who are in custody of the property to remove the encroachment.

5. In that background, when the matter was taken up for hearing that this Court cause an enquiry on Sri.Deepak., learned counsel appearing for the State Bank of India, as to why the Bank has not brought the property to sale, when it came to light that the original documents were not available. Hence, he has called to verify again and make his submission.

Today, a memo along with a letter dated 3.4.2024 addressed by the Branch Manager, Hangal, has been placed on record.

6. A perusal of the said letter would indicate that there are no original documents available with the Bank and perusal of all the records available with the Bank do not disclose deposit of the original title documents nor were the original title documents produced in any of the proceedings filed by the Bank.

7. A perusal of the said letter would indicate the reason why the State Bank of India has been on the side line and not taken any steps, it was for the State Bank India, to have initially itself responded to the official liquidator categorially indicating that the original documents were not available, in such circumstances the official liquidator could have himself gone ahead with the sale of the property or request for the State Bank of India to do so which was the request made by the official liquidator on several occasions. Even in the present application the prayer sought for is a direction to the State Bank of India, to sell the properties.

8. Sri.Deepak., learned counsel submitted that the State Bank of India by itself cannot carry out any sale but would however hasten to submit that the State Bank of India would not have any objection to associate with the official liquidator for bringing about sale of the property.

9. Learned counsel for the official liquidator submits that only photocopies of the documents have been furnished though there are no original documents i.e., certified copies would have to be furnished by the Sate Bank of India.

10. Having perused the memo filed by Sri.Deepak., on behalf of the State Bank of India on 31.1.2022 it is seen that its only photocopies which have been filed.

However, details of the documents were available, in that view of the matter when State Bank of India has no objection to associate with the official liquidator for sale of property, the State Bank of India is directed to furnish the certified copies of the do

                      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                      1
                      2
                      3
                      4
                      5
                      6
                      7
                      8
                      9
                      10
                      11
                      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                      supreme today icon
                      logo-black

                      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                      Please visit our Training & Support
                      Center or Contact Us for assistance

                      qr

                      Scan Me!

                      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                      whatsapp-icon Back to top