HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
SRI C SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI MASTHAN – Respondent
The petitioner having purchased the subject property
under a registered sale deed dated 9.7.2010 filed a petition
under Section 27(2)(r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 for
eviction of the respondent herein. The Trial Court dismissed
the petition stating that the petitioner has not proved the jural
relationship of landlord and tenant. Hence, this petition.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner having acquired the title over the subject
property under the registered sale deed stepped into the shoes
of erstwhile owner and became the landlord of the petition
schedule premises. Hence, the petition filed under Section
27(2)(r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 was maintainable.
However, the Trial Court contrary to the evidence on record has
dismissed the petition and the same is not sustainable in law.
3.
The respondent though served with notice has not
appeared in person or through his counsel.
4.
Considered the submission of the learned counsel
for the petitioner.
5.
The petitioner proved that he had acquired the title
over the subject property through the registered sale deed
dated 9.7.2010 marked as Ex.P1, and copies of tax paid
receipt, khatha cert
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.