SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3976

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
HUVANAGOUDA S/O. HANAMANTHGOUDA ANTARADANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:IRANAGOUDA K KABBUR ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (POA) Act is filed by the petitioner/accused No.1, who is facing trial for offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 351(2), 352, 64(m) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and Sections 6, 12, and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

2. The prosecution alleges that on 04.07.2024, while the complainant was at home with his wife and three children, he woke up at 3:00 AM on 05.07.2024 to attend to a nature call and found that his minor daughter was missing. Suspecting the accused, the complainant lodged a First Information Report against him. The prosecution further alleges that the accused, after abducting the survivor, committed forcible sexual intercourse.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, the learned counsel for the respondent-State, and the learned counsel for respondent No.2 – complainant.

4. At the time of the incident, the survivor was 17 years and 7 months old, while the accused was 26 years old. The question of whether the survivor was a minor on the date of the incident is a matter to be determine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top