Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
C M Joshi, J
Om Prakash S/o Veeramaram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of nature and basis of charges against petitioners. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail by the petitioning counsel and state prosecutor. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's assessment of evidence related to organized crime and bail criteria. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. principle regarding admissibility of confessions and necessary evidence for organized crime charges. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion of granting bail and conditions imposed. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
CAV ORDER
1. These petitions are filed under Sections 482 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short ‘ BNS S’) by accused No.1, 3 and 4 in Crime No.78/2024 of Hubli Town Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Section 20 (b)(ii)A of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘N.D.P.S. Act’) and Sections 318 (4), 336(3), 340(2), 111(3), 316(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 , (for short ‘ BNS ’), seeking regular bail as well as anticipatory bail.
(a) The P.S.I. of Hubli Town Police Station – Maruti R., lodged complaint stating that on 30.07.2024 while he was on duty, he received a credible information that at about 7.00 p.m., a person woul
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
